| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,246 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1163 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
Since the size of the perforations look normal, I would hazard a guess that you have a slight pre-printing crease. Good eyes. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1163 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
If you run a finger gently over it, you should feel the distance of the crease. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
76 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1163 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts |
|
|
If it were a preprinting crease, wouldn't the printing look correct despite the line through it? If I look at the W and the O at the top, as well as DeGrasse's nose, I can see a shift in the images. And the two "s"s in DeGrasse seem awfully close together. But maybe I just don't understand what "preprinting crease" means.
Alan |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
6329 Posts |
|
|
Two printing operations. The red was printed normally, then likely the paper buckled slightly forcing a small crease as the press closed for the black printing. Then off to gumming and perforating.
Add: If this stamp were soaked and ironed-out, the red would appear perfectly correct. The black printing would show a very narrow white unprinted streak along the opened-up fold |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by John Becker - 07/22/2022 10:28 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Add: If this stamp were soaked and ironed-out, the red would appear perfectly correct. The black printing would show a very narrow white unprinted streak along the opened-up fold Further to John's  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4302 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Two printing operations. The red was printed normally, then likely the paper buckled slightly forcing a small crease as the press closed for the black printing. Then off to gumming and perforating. The black ink (as well as the red) was printed normally then the paper buckled between printing and gumming as well as perforation. If you look at the nose when the SCF image is clicked to enlarge you will clearly see the missing due to creasing section of black on the bridge of the nose. That is where the black creasing stands out due to image design and is less obvious elsewhere in the black design. The upper and lower perforation holes where the crease exits the stamp look normal. Edit: Gum bend, Gum crease or Gum wrinkle: A natural occurrence in flat-plate printed stamps where the paper has shrunk and the gum did not shrink at the same rate, causing the stamp to wrinkle. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Parcelpostguy - 07/23/2022 03:22 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
6329 Posts |
|
|
I stand by my proposed printing chronology. Note the continuous engraved lines of the jacket as they cross the crease. The small gap in the bridge of the nose caused by the extra thickness of the multiple layers of paper, as the crease gets slightly larger as it runs toward the top of the stamp. (Or in other words, the red shows a shortening of the design, the black does not.) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4092 Posts |
|
|
I think I agree with JB.
As for "Gum bend, Gum crease or Gum wrinkle", they are rarely tis extreme. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,246 |
|