| Author |
Replies: 45 / Views: 3,308 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1162 Posts |
|
|
Quote: "I also would exclude anybody that has had philatelic legal trouble in the past and there is one that I spotted right away. That person under his birth name which is different now, was expelled from the American Stamp Dealers Association and the American Philatelic Society in the 1980s, and was convicted in 1992 of federal mail fraud for selling fraudulently-altered stamps, taking $124,000 from collectors."
And they are great at marketing and they attract a ton of good material & sales from people who are unaware of who they are dealing with. I, too, am aware of this person and his various crimes. It is hard to not do business with this person, due to the size and breadth of his current operation. Over the years, I have had a SEVERE problem with patronizing his company. In his defense (this almost makes my stomach turn...) his crimes do appear to be in his past. Other than the typical disagreements between collectors and dealers, I am not aware of any crimes (or rumors of them, but I am certainly not in the loop as much as I used to be) in the last many decades. My mother taught me to "forgive and forget", but I must say she was a better person than I. I have certainly not forgotten, and have only forgiven to the point where I do business with this person, as needed, begrudgingly. As for making this particular list, I agree that this person should not belong. But then, my 'list' and Linn's list would be quite different throughout. I agree with perhaps half of their entries. I disagree vehemently with one or two only. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10600 Posts |
|
|
Quote: How much cash expended to become that type of collector? One million, ten million, more? Who cares. What difference does it make. The amount is however much the collector felt like putting into it. The fact remains, that without those types of collectors, dealers would have a more difficult time selling inexpensive material to everyone else, because too many of those sales are not particularly profitable. And as I said before, most collectors would never see many rarities without them exhibiting. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12554 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Who cares. What difference does it make. The amount is however much the collector felt like putting into it. There must be some number that gets you on "the list". I bet it's a BIG number. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
4415 Posts |
|
|
I would apply that criteria for an honors list not an influential list. Bad characters can be very influential and it would be fair game to note it in their writeup on what they did that influenced the hobby.
|
Send note to Staff
|
Al |
| Edited by angore - 10/09/2022 07:09 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10600 Posts |
|
|
Quote: There must be some number that gets you on "the list". I bet it's a BIG number. Of course it's a BIG number. They are/were in a position to spend a BIG number. That should not be held against them. Serious money is always going to be influential somewhere, and doing so in this hobby is a much better place then many others. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12554 Posts |
|
|
I say the number is irrelevant. It is more about celebrity and fame. If Kim Kardashian came out as a stamp collector there would be a huge increase in collectors even if she collected CTO Dunes in a $5 stockbook. People are sheep. How many average people actually know who Bill Gross is? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
878 Posts |
|
|
Quote: It is more about celebrity and fame. I discovered something interesting this week. Apparently, Lee Harvey Oswald and his brother collected stamps in their youth. Source: Reclaiming History by Vincent Bugliosi.Quote: How many average people actually know who Bill Gross is? I'm glad you framed the question in this manner. I would answer, "Probably a lot fewer than who know that Bill is gross!"  John |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1162 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I would apply that criteria for an honors list not an influential list. Bad characters can be very influential and it would be fair game to note it in their writeup on what they did that influenced the hobby. Given the criteria of the list, I would agree. But then frame the page-long 'tribute' explaining the person's 'warts' that got him on the list. I have been a continual subscriber to Linn's for decades (3? 4?) and have tended to renew at the last minute. In recent years, I have found that I have been reading the paper less and less. A few weeks ago, I received one of those "We Miss You" notices from them in the mail. I looked back in my records and realized that I had not been receiving Linn's for a few MONTHS and I hadn;t even noticed until they told me. I had to ask myself, "How did you miss that??" I decided that I am getting all my stamp news from other sources like right here, the AP, etc. Although Linn's has some value in the hobby, I realized that it's value TO ME has waned over the years, to the point where I don't even miss it. Oh well. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
347 Posts |
|
|
While I don't have Bill Gross' money, I respect his stamp collections AND his donations to the stamp collecting community, chiefly through the National Museum. That, alone, has had an influence on many, many stamp collectors and potential collectors. Most certainly not gross. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
878 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Most certainly not gross. Just to be clear, I was not referring to THAT Bill. I was referring to a generic Bill.  John |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12554 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10600 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I say the number is irrelevant. It is more about celebrity and fame. Most collectors of that stature are already well known if they want to be. Especially in the past, anyone with that kind of money was known. Most of those collectors did not seem to care about celebrity, or at least did not use philately per se to achieve it. The average person couldn't care less about stamps anyway, and fame among other philatelists is hardly what one would call "big time". |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2055 Posts |
|
|
Bill Steiner revolutionized my collecting, that's for darn sure. But Linn's isn't about to give him free print space - they'd just as soon that no one in the wider collecting community was even aware that his work exists at all. They sure as heck don't want people knowing that they can get access to pages covering the entire world to date for less than the cost of what Amos charges for a single binder. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10600 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Bill Steiner revolutionized my collecting, that's for darn sure. But Linn's isn't about to give him free print space - they'd just as soon that no one in the wider collecting community was even aware that his work exists at all. They sure as heck don't want people knowing that they can get access to pages covering the entire world to date for less than the cost of what Amos charges for a single binder. I can't imagine that anyone is remotely surprised by this. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8408 Posts |
|
|
So the three most important people in the past 20 years who improved the collecting experience and made a impact on the most philatelist are Bill Steiner with his pages , with Tom at SAN's and our Don on this board ,all working with hundreds if not thousands of people all with their computer work .
This was no mistake , notice the company and people who made that Influence list were better off before the acceptance of the internet and computers . |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by floortrader - 10/10/2022 9:03 pm |
|
Replies: 45 / Views: 3,308 |
|