| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,008 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
8 Posts |
|
|
|
Don't want to use mounts but don't want to ruin stamps with hinges. Theses are all to be mounted/hinged in Scott international albums and Minkus supreme Global.
*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1086 Posts |
|
|
If you are not wanting to use mounts because you don't want to affix the mount to the page, I have heard others say they use mounts, but then hinge the mount to the page. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1055 Posts |
|
|
I think this is why people pay $25 for a package of vintage Dennison peelable hinges instead of $5 for modern non-peelable ones. Much easier to move/remove the stamps with the old peelable hinges. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1847 Posts |
|
|
You could store the stamp in a Vario page in a separate binder, and hinge a color photocopy of the stamp to the album page. "Don't want to use mounts" severely limits solutions. It's what most collectors would choose for this situation. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3487 Posts |
|
|
There is also a hybrid solution which probably isn't very viable for a large collection with lots of valuable stamps. If its only a small number - then use a mount for the stamp in its place in the album. When you won't be looking at the album for awhile, remove the stamp from the mount and put it in safer storage somewhere. Other than that, as previously stated, your options would seem to be limited... |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1434 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Don't want to use mounts So... you 1) don't want to use hinges or mounts and, 2) do want to use Scott and Minkus albums. These two requirements are incompatible with each other. One of these is more important to you than the other, figure out which one and we can move forward from there. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8579 Posts |
|
|
Spend some money on some decent vintage hinges. And what do you consider "high value"? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
853 Posts |
|
|
You will need to draw a line at some dollar value, below which you will use hinges of one type or another, and above which you''ll use mounts.
"High value" will have very different connotations to various collectors on the forum and out there in the wild. To some, that might be $1,000 USD. And I expect they use a mount. To others "high value" might mean $5 per stamp. Or maybe $1 per stamp. SoI don't think the term "high value" is helpfulin addressing your good question. How about "enough value?"
Search the forum for the words "hinge" and "mount " and youll find some thinking over the years on this judgement call. Which really all depends on context and your own tastes.
More on context and taste: For me, I use somewhere between $2 and $5 paid as the dividing line these days in my French collection. Below that gets a Dennison hinge, above a clear mount. This stems from taking in a hinged collection years ago which I've grown and in some instances improved. Interspersing hinges and mounts almost certainly diminishes the monetary value which might be recouped by my heirs when they dispose of this collection, but I just dont feel good about hinging a somewhat valued stamp when I've been fortunate enough to be its temporary custodian for a few years.
Over in my US collection, though, I started using black backed Showgard mounts years ago so everything gets a mount ( up to about 1980 where I taper off the collection.). But that's compelled by aesthetics, and divorced from any putative monetary value. In this context, the MNH-OG 1950s commemorative gets a black mount, even when I've used its duplicate as postage this week.
|
Send note to Staff
|
-- Jonathan |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1162 Posts |
|
|
I have hinged $100 stamps in albums. My more expensive ones go in mounts. But then, I like the look of mounts and don't find them to be a problem.
Whenever I see a high value stamp hinged in place (whether I hinged it in or bought a collection with it done by the previous owner), I cut the hinge at the fold - 'sharp' side of tongs brought up to the fold, and force it through the fold in the hinge - and remove the stamp from the album leaving the small folded section stuck to the stamp. I've done this for decades, and can tell if this is the type of hinge to peel away easily (then I simply peel the remainder of the hinge off the stamp) or I will soak it off. If there is any question about which it is, I soak it off. I also take into account the paper of the stamp. Soft paper can thin more easily than more robust paper. I have thinned a bunch of stamps in my day, but very rarely do it anymore - experience guides how I treat each stamp with a hinge. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2830 Posts |
|
|
What exactly is the issue with stamp mounts that leads you to not wanting to use them? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,008 |
|