Quote:I would not be surprised if someone at
ebay had the luminous idea to consider its inland address for the shipping service as an alternative for sellers who are excluding certain countries and implemented it. The seller may still perceive he is blocking a country and
ebay is playing 're-shipper' without the seller knowing it.
Makes sense... and as long as the seller's obligation ends when
ebay's domestic hub receives the merchandise (which is the case under EIS), I think this is perfectly fine.
The focus in this thread has been how EIS's inflated shipping charges impact prospective buyers, as the Global Shipping Program did before it. I understand and appreciate your frustration, as it limits who you can buy from... what I'm trying to convey is an understanding on how it is appealing to U.S. sellers and why it makes sense to use it. This is unfortunately a case where buyer and seller interests are pitted against one another.
One aspect that hasn't been touched upon in any of the EIS discussions is how it simplifies the life of the seller with respect to having to know the customs restrictions and limitations for every single country for different categories of items. As someone who has always done a lot of international shipping on
ebay, and especially because I sell many different types of merchandise across different categories, this was a HUGE issue for me personally.
1. USPS insurance rates are not only extremely high, but the restrictions are draconian as well, i.e., 1st class international cannot be insured, meaning you have to uprate the shipment.
2. Certain types of merchandise cannot be shipped via USPS to certain countries, and the regulations are written so nebulously that depending on which USPS clerk or which USPS office you use, you can get different interpretations on different days... not good as a shipper.
3. Some countries have valuation limits for incoming parcels, and if a package value exceeds those limits, customs will kick the parcel back.
4. Certain buyers will reject parcels upon receipt (or receipt at customs) once they realize they have to pay VAT, despite the fact that they should have known this. Seller is on the hook for the shipping costs.
#1 can be mitigated somewhat by using a third-party insurer rather than carrier-based insurance, but each third-party insurer also has its own list of excluded countries, or countries where only nominal coverage is offered, e.g., Russian republics where the parcel is only covered to the point the plane touches down, no coverage beyond that.
What you end up with, especially if you sell multiple types of merchandise (as I do), not just stamps, is different policies for different item categories. Keeping track of which countries to enable for which listings in which categories, and which can be fully insured vs. not, is a very laborious requirement.
EIS solves all of this, as
ebay controls which listings are shown to prospective bidders/buyers in other countries based upon customs limits, merchandise type, etc. The seller no longer has to keep up with an ever changing list of rules and restrictions. It's similar to if you as a seller had to calculate, collect, report, and remit state sales tax on your own vs.
ebay doing it. The rates and regulations change almost daily, creating a ginormous administrative burden.
The insurance minefield is also greatly simplified, as you only have to insure to the domestic hub; there's no international component, either costwise or regulationwise. Once
ebay receives the merchandise, their responsibility and policies take over.
For those saying "who cares about insurance" or "I don't want insurance", remember that insurance isn't there to protect the buyer. It's there to protect the seller. Buyers are 100% covered against loss or damage by
ebay. Sellers are not. Any purchase of insurance is for the seller's benefit, and yes it's a big deal. Opting into EIS makes this component also more streamlined and less costly.
I get that many international buyers, especially of lower-priced items, won't like EIS. For those sellers who cater to that demographic, perhaps it's best for their business model to not utilize EIS.