Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

What Is The Proper Term For Stamps That Have Been Cut Out From An Envelope / Postcard?

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 2,346Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
6341 Posts
Posted 03/31/2024   8:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
We seem to have lost out original poster. I may be wrong, but I get a sense the replies here come mostly from stamp collector standpoint rather than postal history perspective. Let me go out on a limb and to try to describe a continuum from large to small...

Entire: exactly what it says, the whole mailpiece ... whether envelope, postcard, postal stationery, etc.

Reduced: a fairly general term often seen describing a mostly intact cover perhaps with a rough edge trimmed off to square it up. Sometimes it happens naturally in commerce. Consider, in the era of mailing utility bill payments, that much business mail was run through an automatic opener which trimmed a very small strip off the top and sometimes into the stamp.

Back flap absent: a specific example of "reduced" of approximately the same amount of paper loss. Can easily happen with unsealed 3rd class mail run through an opener.

Front: typically the front panel of an envelope. I have seen a lot of these on WWII-era metered mail where the front panel was saved as a collectible and the back side sent to the paper recycling drives for the war effort (as the explanation I have heard for these). Stampless folded letters often have had their contents removed leaving only the outer address panel. This is also about where large pieces of parcel wrappings tend to fall along the continuum.

Clippings: often 3x5 or 2x4 to save the entire cancel with the stamp, or frequently with metered envelopes to save a strip across the entire top of the envelope showing the meter imprint and the return address. These clippings have fallen out of favor with recent postal historians who want entires, although they do provide valuable eary/late date of use information.

On piece: which might include "clippings" above but typically are stamps cut or torn much closer than 2x4, often removing a significant portion of the cancel. Stamps on piece in large enough groups to be treated as a "lot" (or weighed, if you wish), would be called "on paper kiloware". This is also where most neatly-cut postal stationery of embossed envelope "cut squares" would fall, or a "full corner" if the clipping includes the back flap portion of the stationery.

Off-paper: removed from the envelope backing paper. And in bulk would be "off paper kiloware".

And specific individual items may take a more detailed description ... where an iliustration is more valuable than words. Along that tangent, crash mail is one example. I was amused many years ago by an auction catalog description as "among the best Hindenburg crash covers known", yet does one want one burned the most or least? With a certain franking or routing? Etc.

And then how would this be described? No stamp, but still possibly useful to the postal historian to document a date of use of Wooster Ohio's Universal Model-G machine, perhaps early or late use? (And slit open along the bottem!)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 03/31/2024 8:57 pm
Valued Member
United States
330 Posts
Posted 04/01/2024   4:09 pm  Show Profile Check DC3's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add DC3 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
To answer the specific question, I think "the most proper" term is cut-out, or clipping.
It is not always a "geometric square", or a corner stamp.
Very rarely, some postcards are not paper, but wood, etc., hence the stamp is not "on paper".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 2,346Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

  Can Someone Get Too Obsessd With A Stamp?
  I Seem To Be Returning Here After A Long Time Away
  Just Collecting Auctions - Commonwealth Philatelic Rarities - Ends 30 July
  Question Regarding My Grandfather's Stamp Collection
  How Did Engravers At Babn In 1980 Make Changes To An Engraved Cylinder?
  Louisville & Nashville Rail Road CO Postcards And Mail Related Items
  Unusual World War 1 Patriotic War Effort Fundraising Postcards
  Almost There, One More Stamp To Go.share Your Pages Missing One Stamp
  Do You Collect Hungarian Philately With A Judaic Focus?
  Vertical Line Across 2 Stamps Of Bk291
  Difference Between 6096A And 6096B ?
  Need To Know If These Stamps Are Real Errors And Worth Certifying
  Sweden 1.40kr Fluorescent Paper - Interesting Letter
  Patriotic Covers During The Civil War
  Tracking Standard Envelopes? (Imb / Informed Visibility). Intelligent Mail Barcodes.
  Caught In The Mail: Using A "muster" (Specimen) As Postage A Month Early!
  Looking For Ken Pugh Fakes & Forgeries Books / Manuals
  Sending Invoices For Ebay International Orders
  Collecting Aerograms/Air Letters
  #u536 Pre-First Day Cover
  "it's Just Me" Quarterly Stamp Show On August 7th, 8th, & 9th 2026 In Nashville, TN
  Any Info On A Scotts US 65 Imperf On Left
  Any Tips On Identifying Scott 6107 - 6112
  Scott US 406c The Search Continues
  Nashville Philatelic Society-Your Invitation To Our Auction Night Meeting Monday, July 27, 2026

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.13 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05