| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,460 |
|
Valued Member
Switzerland
81 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1055 Posts |
|
|
Unlikely that anyone would certify the stamp on cover, the stamp would have to be removed from the cover to see if the stamp had even a lightly -pressed grill. From the front, I see something that looks like impressions from grill points to the right of the smokestack of the train. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2830 Posts |
|
|
Stamp almost certainly isn't original to this cover. It has been placed over a hand-written marking. May as well remove the stamp and get it certified, as appropriate, since in it's current state it is nothing more than a contrivance. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by shermae - 07/19/2024 5:50 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1055 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Stamp almost certainly isn't original to this cover. It has been placed over a hand-written marking. May as well remove the stamp and get it certified, as appropriate, since in its current state it is nothing more than a contrivance. I don't agree. Who hasn't ever addressed a letter and then placed a stamp on the letter that approaches or covers part of the handwritten address? Maybe only me (I use a lot of plate singles on letters and the bottom selvage sometimes encroaches on the top line of the address). Regardless, a scan of the complete cover (front and back) would help answer a couple of questions about the item. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2830 Posts |
|
|
I missed that, assuming the location of the writing meant it was a postal marking. Still, the cancel covers the perfs but not the paper next to it. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
148 Posts |
|
|
shermae, what in the world are you talking about? First was overlooked the obvious, that the stamp simply covered a bit of the addressing or endorsement. Now the squarish obliterator is said to not "tie" the stamp to the cover? Of course it does.
trust, given the title of your post regarding "grill", when I first saw your picture I immediately noticed a grill pattern impression or likeness to the right of the locomotive smokestack, just as another poster noted. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
I don't have the correct software to show the result, but there is definitely a grill pattern in the right, middle of the stamp. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6526 Posts |
|
|
I agree with Partime. It does look like there is a pattern there. But whether it is a grill is another thing. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Switzerland
81 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
|
On the same subject, can anyone see a grill on my example? I can't see one myself, but perhaps you can.  Here's the front:  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jimjamtwo - 07/23/2024 8:29 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10599 Posts |
|
|
Pretend that you are looking for a watermark and dip it in fluid, that should bring up the grill. Probably near the bottom. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
644 Posts |
|
|
1869s without grill are worthless without a cert.
The PF has made it very clear they won't issue a cert on any ungrilled 1869 unless it has original gum.
It is far too easy to press the grill out of a used example. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10599 Posts |
|
|
Even when pressed out, dipping the stamp will often show signs of the grill. Usually it has to be looked at at an oblique angle under the light, but it often does show something. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
6526 Posts |
|
|
I would say there is a trace of a grill on the righthand edge (as seen from the back) halfway up. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,460 |
|