| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 2,816 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
543 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8578 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
543 Posts |
|
|
After much comparison, I see that the Over-print, in addition to the decoration of the side columns, is very evident in the shadow of the eye, the hair, on the neck at the line of contact with the hair, the mustache and on the apple neck. ..no detail of bad design indicates to me that it could be forgie, the volumes, the shapes, distances, typography...if it were forgie it would really be a work excellently transferred from the original... |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Murasama - 07/21/2024 06:12 am |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
190 Posts |
|
|
Question to the experts. Is the brown markings on the bottom of the first example rust? If so is it good idea to retain in the collection or infectious should it be removed as soon as posible for discard? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Chesham85 - 07/21/2024 4:54 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
543 Posts |
|
|
I found both together in a small envelope inside the "everything at 10 cents" box. They have been together like this for decades, and have not infected each other...anyway, maybe it could be dangerous for other stamps, as soon as I can I will do it. a cleaning and I will leave it healthy... |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
729 Posts |
|
|
Not an expert, but my money on over-inking. First of all, the stamp is very cheap for some one to go to the length of forging it. Second, most important, every shape, every angle, every position looks correct. Just to much ink imho. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
558 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
11 Posts |
|
|
I picked up something similar with this example which is also missing the frameline at the bottom and part of one 0:  Does anyone know if this is recognised as a variety? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
France, Metropolitan
3744 Posts |
|
|
It is just printing defects, not constantv flaws.Otherwise your stamp could be from position 145 from sheet panel D1 (july 1854 - 1860). 150 stamps in each sheet. 9 main plates. There is a break in the outside right frame line just below the middle.This is a constant flaw found in this position in plate D1. https://archives-wikitimbres.fr/pla..._planche=14A |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
11 Posts |
|
|
Merci perf12. Thank you for clarifying and for sharing the link to that quite incredible resource. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 2,816 |
|