As in the thread that has been deleted, you are trying to suggest things that have not been written.
"Looks much more like" is in comparison to a printing from a badly wiped plate. It even implies it does not exactly look like the printing on the common paper. Again, the stamp is viewed from the front and not from the back.
If you would put as much effort into informing yourself of how images can distort colours as you put into posting links to articles that do not prove anything you claim, you might recognise your confirmation bias.
Why post this ? It is clearly posted here already. If you need to add something like this do it on the post were it makes sense, like the earlier post you have
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here