Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Would This Make The Cut For 634c?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 750Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
32 Posts
Posted 12/23/2024   5:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Native to your friends list Get a Link to this Message



Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
4311 Posts
Posted 12/23/2024   5:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
No.

Edit: rogdcam and John Becker posted while I was getting the below information together for an edit, but new post was now more appropriate.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Parcelpostguy - 12/23/2024 6:01 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
12569 Posts
Posted 12/23/2024   5:41 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
No. The operative word here for 634c is "pair", and this is not a pair but rather a complete stamp with maybe 5/100th's of another stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
6330 Posts
Posted 12/23/2024   5:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Fully agree with "no".
Your stamp is very consistent with being the upper right stamp from a booklet pane, on which minor cutting shifts are fairly common. The combination of a narrow top margin and a staple hole (between the 3rd and 4th perf holes) is also consistent with coming from a booklet. (In contrast, sheet selvedge tends to be much wider and staple holes much farther from the stamps.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4311 Posts
Posted 12/23/2024   5:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There are just two of these, 634c, known (as of 2013).




The image above is a 634c. If you compare it closely with your example, you will find that the spacing between the stamps or in your case, stamp and part of stamp is different. The white space between the real 634c is more narrow. Yours and the two currently offered examples similar to yours, but used (wishing for about $50 each from the sellers) on ebay are from booklet panes which were slight miscut. The real 634c was made from stamps internal to a sheet, not the booklet plate layout.

Now to go with the illustration for Siegel's here is the description from sale #1040 Lot 2018 (dates 3/26-28/2013)


Quote:
2c Carmine, Ty. I, Horizontal Pair, Imperforate Between (634c). Bright color, crisp impression, trivial natural inclusion between stamps, light vertical crease between stamps resulting in tiny break at bottom perf hole

VERY FINE APPEARANCE. AN EXTREMELY RARE ORIGINAL-GUM PAIR OF THE 2-CENT CARMINE TYPE I WHICH IS IMPERFORATE BETWEEN. THIS IS THE FIRST WE HAVE OFFERED SINCE KEEPING COMPUTERIZED RECORDS.

Our computerized records, which include our Rarities sales from 1964 and all auctions after 1995, did not contain another example. A review of almost 800 PDF catalogues at our website found only one other. The Datz book states the quantity known as "very rare". A search of the P.F.'s online records located one other example (ex 1968 Lilly sale, described as unique).

With copy of 1977 P.F. certificate


Edited to add a missing "ed" to a word.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Parcelpostguy - 12/23/2024 6:04 pm
Valued Member
United States
32 Posts
Posted 12/23/2024   7:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Native to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ty for the wonderful information!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
652 Posts
Posted 12/24/2024   10:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wtcrowe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
High probability that your stamp is a booklet pane single.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6661 Posts
Posted 12/24/2024   10:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
These booklet pane miscuts are very common.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Switzerland
483 Posts
Posted 12/24/2024   2:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add drkohler to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
These booklet pane miscuts are very common

Well..no, not really.
If your sample is a (partial) 554c pane, it is very uncommon. If it's a (partial) 634d pane, it's still not common.

Miscuts are common on the Presidential 804a/806b/807a panes. Those were printed during WWII wartime when paper was important for the war effort and "anything goes as long as it's still recognisable" was the rule in the Bureau of Engraving. Hence the masses of miscut Presidential panes still floating around.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 750Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05