Quote:
Using words like RARE or Very Rare should be used when talking about stamps where there is a big demand for.
I disagree.
Demand has no bearing on whether something is scarce or rare. VALUE, on the other hand, is directly associated with demand.
I have many items that are RARE, but because they only appeal to a very narrow audience and thus have little demand, they have very little VALUE.... but that doesn't make them any less rare.
There are also many items listed in Scott (and other catalogs) that are caught in that sub-several-hundred-dollar range, where they don't justify being lotted by auction firms as singles, so get lumped into bulk/balance lots, despite their being truly scarce items. So they never appreicate commensurate with their scarcity.
I would go so far as to say there are some minimum-Scott-value stamps that border on rare, that one never sees. Since there's no demand though, they have no value other than to the (few) people hunting for them.
Just because something isn't desirable doesn't make it not scarce.