I'm assembling my collection of non-denominational uses and am looking for a term that describes the use of higher than required postage on cover. I think that I remember that 'overfranked' has been used, but am not certain.
Is it just me, or over franked covers frowned upon. It seems that they are not regarded as legitimate. I see in listings by dealers that a cover is over franked, as if that is important in the description. I know that in the Presidential series, when you are looking for a solo usage, it must pay a proper usage requiring precisely that amount.
I for one have over franked letters and thought nothing of it. If I have a doubt that one stamp is enough, then I slap a second on without a thought as to the legitimacy for a future collector.
I'm doing a study of how people dealt with the postal rate changes of 1978-1988 wherein the use of the 'alphabet' stamps was prevalent. It seems that confusion was rampant and there were many, many strange combinations of postage, often 'over-franked' which were used to pay the varying rates.
Yes Rohumpy, over franked covers are usually frowned upon and brings to the forefront Commercial use vs. philatelic use. The Philatelic use covers are said to be contrived and manufactured for profit whereas Commercial is what it is, legitimate postal use and Single use is preferred amongst some collectors.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here