Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Washington #36B

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,153Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
744 Posts
Posted 04/26/2011   10:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add kosmet to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This looks like a #36b. Do you concur?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2277 Posts
Posted 04/26/2011   10:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nitrolures to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Not very experienced with US classics but noticed the double outter left frame line. Hard to tell other areas without having studied this stamp but usually signs of re entry of some sorts. Although could posibly be a constant but someone will chime in.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts
Posted 04/26/2011   11:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TheSeal619 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Just taking a quick look at your post. I do not think it is a 36b but rather a 36. Even though your stamp has most of the outer frame missing on the right and top, the frame on the left and bottom do not look colse to being correct. I have attached a scan of one of my mint 36b plate III so that you might judge for yourdself.
Ron

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
199 Posts
Posted 04/26/2011   11:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add otto to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'll concur on the 36B. The topmost right side perf blob doesn't appear to have any ink on it, thus matching what is shown in the Specialized definition of the type. Here's my 36 to compare it to:


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts
Posted 04/27/2011   6:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TheSeal619 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Otto!
That is a very nicely centered 36 you have there.WTG
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 08/31/2012   1:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here is mine. The centering sucks but the price was right and it's sound so I figured what the heck!

EDIT: Mine is a #36b notice the broken frame lines on left side.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by I_Love_Stamps - 09/08/2012 09:34 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts
Posted 08/31/2012   5:29 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chipg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yours looks like the plate 1 - recut frame lines (Scott 36)
Here are the two types of the 12c 1857 issue (Scott 36 and 36b), and the 12c 1861 issue (Scott 69)
By the way - people outside of the US won't have a clue what you're talking about if you just use a random catalog number without saying which catalog or what stamp.




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by chipg - 08/31/2012 5:35 pm
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 09/08/2012   09:36 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
people outside of the US won't have a clue what you're talking about if you just use a random catalog number without saying which catalog or what stamp.


True but the image is self explanatory methinks?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts
Posted 09/08/2012   9:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chipg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
right, but the title is what gets people interested. When I see something that says, for example: "Question about #556," I have no idea - and I collect US stamps.

Think about which of these titles would be the clearer one:
My new 85E!
or
My new 1868 12c Z-Grill (#85E)

Just a suggestion.
(By the way, when I read a British auction listing Canadian stamps by SG numbers, I'm completly lost, so it's not just US material I'm talking about).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10605 Posts
Posted 09/08/2012   9:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Otto, in my opinion your example has been reperforated at bottom. Of course that scan was posted 18 months ago, so this opinion might not get noticed, but........
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 2,153Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05