Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Any Coments Out There On This Odd Dated?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 2,226Next Topic  
Valued Member

136 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   1:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Wil Bobbin to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This dated reads left to right "SEP * NBH, upside down.

Send note to Staff

Rest in Peace
Canada
6750 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   2:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Puzzler to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
First turned upside-down but date still unreadable:


Then I flipped this pic side to side so date is readable:


I think it is a date picked up from laying this stamp face down on a freshly dated (for some reason) piece of paper, not necessarily a postal dating either.

edit added second pic
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Puzzler - 10/17/2011 8:37 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   2:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Could be "SEP 61 NBH" ? Purely a guess.

I suspect the "NBH" stood for National Bellas Hess, a former catalog mail order house, with this history behind it:


Quote:
The company was founded in the late 1800s as National Cloak & Suit and renamed National Bellas Hess around 1910, as folklore has it. It was located between Washington, Morton and Barrow streets in New York's Greenwich Village. "We have no agents or branch stores," it said in its 1920-21 fall-winter catalog. "We sell only direct from this catalog and anyone claiming to represent us is an imposter." But what a catalog it was. The whole book was illustrated and included many color pages. There was no photography.

Many items seem quaint today — like sleeping caps, union suits, corsets and "knickerbockers " (the short pants that schoolboys couldn't wait to outgrow). Some were expensive. An embroidered crepe blouse went for $9.98. An "ultra smart style" woman's suit could cost up to $47.95 — no small amount in 1920. Ladies' shoes could be bought for around $4.98. Except for sweaters and work shirts, there wasn't much for men. By 1928, the firm now known as National Bellas Hess had annual sales of $40 million, and this number grew by $17 million when it acquired a competitor: The Charles Williams Stores.

Where does the history come in? It started in 1966, when Bellas Hess, now located in Kansas City, fought a bid by Illinois to force it to collect state sales and use taxes. The matter was litigated right up to the Supreme Court. And in May 1967, Justice Potter Stewart, writing for the 6-3 majority, wrote that a company had to have "nexus" with a state — i.e., a physical presence — to be liable for the use-tax burden. Failing that, states could not impose "the duty of use tax collection and payment upon a seller whose only connection with customers in the state is by common carrier or the United States mail," Stewart wrote. He added: "The very purpose of the Commerce Clause was to ensure a national economy free from such unjustifiable local entanglements."

The decision which led to a period of unprecedented mail order growth, was largely reaffirmed by the High Court in the 1992 Quill case. But that didn't help Bellas Hess much. Trapped in the downward spiral that pulled in all the general catalogs, Bellas Hess entered bankruptcy in 1971 and eventually went out of business. But its name lives on in the landmark ruling.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 10/17/2011 2:37 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2758 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   2:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
WT1 I believe you are correct! I'm at work will confirm & add any detail I find!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2758 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   7:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wt1, Confirmed NBH = National Bellas Hess type C22 was only used in 1938-39. That is not correct one
All 12 printed varieties are formatted differently, principally, XXX-month-year, not Month-year-XXX.
It is possible that this is an unlisted variety.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
136 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   9:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Wil Bobbin to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Possibly the allignment of stamp to the printer was shifted about 7 or 8 mm to the right, which removed NBH from the left side?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
Canada
6750 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   10:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Puzzler to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Maybe one sheet with the printed date was laid atop another sheet but face down to achieve the backwards letters?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2758 Posts
Posted 10/17/2011   10:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is possible! And likely since the month & identifier do not line up straight!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 2,226Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05