Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

FDC

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,289Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
987 Posts
Posted 01/28/2012   1:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add TinMan to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Quick question. Is a Mint First Day Cover issued by the P.O. worth less or more than a First Day Cover that goes through the regular mail addressed to the recipient? I hope I was clear enough. What about the FDC that have the raised Burgundy cloth with the stamp embossed in Gold?

Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 01/28/2012   1:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There is no such thing as a "mint" First Day Cover, as a FDC by definition bears a "First Day of Issue" cancellation rendering the stamp(s) used. What I think you are referring to is an "unaddressed" First Day Cover versus one that is addressed to a recipient.

An unaddressed FDC is always worth more (worth is a relative term, though). On older covers, addressed FDC's were the norm, and therefore are quite acceptable, although unaddressed covers would carry a better value as they are typically harder to find.

Fast forward to the present day and unaddressed covers are the preferred way to collect FDC's. Even if you service them yourself, you can place a removable return address label on the covers and the item is returned by the US Postal Service in a cellophane wrapper to avoid any undesirable postal markings that would otherwise take away from the desirability of the item.

Virtually all covers issued after 1950 must bear a cachet (printed artwork) on the left side of the cover in order to be desirable for most collectors. There are many makers of such cachets, including the ones you have noted that would have raised burgundy cloth and/or stamps embossed in gold. The latter was quite common on the marketplace about 20 years ago but were sold at unrealistically high prices and most who subscribed to the collections were disappointed to learn that the value of the covers held little value. The "gold" embossing is not really gold, but merely a thin gold plating or overlay that is virtually worthless in terms of its gold value, so it was only a promotional gimmick to market attractive looking first day covers.

Typically in today's market (with a few exceptions) most US First Day Covers carry a catalog value of $1 or so, with resale values on the secondary market typically 10% to 30% of that figure, so individually the covers are really not worth all that much at resale.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
987 Posts
Posted 01/28/2012   1:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TinMan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks wt1 for clearing the matter up for me. I thought what you said was true but I wanted someone else to confirm my thoughts. Thanks for your prompt reply. Chuck
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,289Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05