Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

China Secret Marks

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 5,927Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
109 Posts
Posted 03/01/2012   2:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add falconrw to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I am currently attempting to identify several China stamps. Specifically the 1938-1941 Dr. Sun Yat-Sen issues. Scott's catalog lists the various Secret Marks along with pictures of some of the marks. However, they do not have pictures of the marks on the 30 or 50 cent stamps. Can anyone offer any insight or links? Thanking you in advance.


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 03/01/2012   3:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'm assuming your stamps are Type III.

Although the secret mark is one way to ID some of the stamps in that set, another way is to check the watermark. The first 1940 set is unwatermarked. The second 1940 set for which there are secret marks is watermarked.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
109 Posts
Posted 03/01/2012   3:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add falconrw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks KHJ. You are correct. The stamp must have a watermark and Perf. 14 to have a Secret Mark. It then appears to me that all A57 stamps with the perf. 14 and the watermark are automatically with Secret Mark, so, what is the point of even mentioning the secret marks in as much detail as they do? I initially missed the mark due to the Secret Mark Illustrations being placed on the page before the Unwmk. Stamp listings and just assumed the Secret Watermarks would be on either variety.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 03/01/2012   4:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
It then appears to me that all A57 stamps with the perf. 14 and the watermark are automatically with Secret Mark

The stamps are known to exist in "other than perf 14". Scott does not catalog these varieties. But in general, your statement is correct -- although...

Actually, I'm not sure every stamp in the 2nd (watermarked) set has a secret mark. I don't remember.

My China collection is archived. Can you do me a favor?

The two 50c stamps have the same Chinese character for "five" as in the 5c stamp. The character in the upper right corner is the character "five" as used for currency. It looks like the "five" on your 50c stamps are connected at the base -- which means no secret mark. Can you check to see if it is watermarked? If the 50c stamp has the same secret mark as the 5c stamp, then I would expect your 2 stamps to be unwatermarked.

Thanks in advance.

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 03/01/2012 4:13 pm
Valued Member
United States
109 Posts
Posted 03/01/2012   5:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add falconrw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes KHJ they are unwatermarked. It was just me and the way I tried to read the catalog. I just finished the Martyr's Issues and realize if it is a Perf 14 it is the early issue and if it perf. 12.5, 13 or compound you must then check for watermark. Once again, the "Secret Maks" don't really make a difference, with the exception of the 1 cent orange #422 which may not have the "Secret Mark". I would submit that the illustration for the Martyr's Issue secret mark should be placed after the listing of the 1 cent stamp Scott #422 as that is only place where it would make any difference. However, I have checked some of my older catalogs and Scott has always done it this way, so it must be correct.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 03/01/2012   6:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you for verifying.

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 5,927Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

  Can Someone Get Too Obsessd With A Stamp?
  I Seem To Be Returning Here After A Long Time Away
  Just Collecting Auctions - Commonwealth Philatelic Rarities - Ends 30 July
  Question Regarding My Grandfather's Stamp Collection
  How Did Engravers At Babn In 1980 Make Changes To An Engraved Cylinder?
  Louisville & Nashville Rail Road CO Postcards And Mail Related Items
  Unusual World War 1 Patriotic War Effort Fundraising Postcards
  Almost There, One More Stamp To Go.share Your Pages Missing One Stamp
  Do You Collect Hungarian Philately With A Judaic Focus?
  Vertical Line Across 2 Stamps Of Bk291
  Difference Between 6096A And 6096B ?
  Need To Know If These Stamps Are Real Errors And Worth Certifying
  Sweden 1.40kr Fluorescent Paper - Interesting Letter
  Patriotic Covers During The Civil War
  Tracking Standard Envelopes? (Imb / Informed Visibility). Intelligent Mail Barcodes.
  Caught In The Mail: Using A "muster" (Specimen) As Postage A Month Early!
  Looking For Ken Pugh Fakes & Forgeries Books / Manuals
  Sending Invoices For Ebay International Orders
  Collecting Aerograms/Air Letters
  #u536 Pre-First Day Cover
  "it's Just Me" Quarterly Stamp Show On August 7th, 8th, & 9th 2026 In Nashville, TN
  Any Info On A Scotts US 65 Imperf On Left
  Any Tips On Identifying Scott 6107 - 6112
  Scott US 406c The Search Continues
  Nashville Philatelic Society-Your Invitation To Our Auction Night Meeting Monday, July 27, 2026

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05