USA 32 33 35

Hello I picked these up and the listing was 32 33 35, is this the correct order left to right? Not to good with the us stamps.
Thanks in advance

Would need more detailed scans. 32 (Type 2), 33 (Type 3) & 35 (Type 5) come from the same sheet so the devil is in the details.

Hello....all are #35, type V....they all have 2 ball in the LR scroll, only type V,#35 has this....sorry to be the bearer of the bad news. Please return to seller.

I think the one on the far right is a bit different. Look at the "shells" in the upper right & left. Could be just under inking or fuzzy scan? I don't know but a better scan would be neat/helpful anyway. Thank you.

I LOVE STAMPS....At first look again...the one on the right is the least likely to be anything other than a #35...just because of the wide margins. The other types of the 10c issue have narrow spacing between stamps. Guaranteed all #35.

Thanks guys contacted the seller .Should not be a problem

10c Washington Quick ID Guide:

http://reviews.ebay.com/1851-1857-1...000006063248

Bottom line is on the 3 beads on the lower right and lower left-- if they are present, the stamp can not be #35. If they are not all present, the stamp must be #35. From the scan, I can't see it well enough, except that the 3rd stamp is definitely a #35.

I think that the 1st stamp is actually a type II. I can see when I click on it, the 3 beads, and the top is complete. Type II, #32. Other than one short perf on the bottom left, it's a pretty nice stamp.

I just can't see the beads on the 2nd one, though they may be there. If you magnify the stamp, and can see all 3 beads, it will be Type III, #33, because the design is not complete at the top and at at the bottom.

Hope this helps.....Ray

I would agree with ray.mac and you may wish to hold off on returning the stamps. The cut away of the side ornaments on the right stamp along with the nearly complete lower right shell is a #35 feature. The 3rd ball on the left of the middle stamp may have been cut out by the perforation. Left and middle stamps appear to have very complete side ornaments. From what I know and researched, there are no #35 stamps with complete side ornaments.

Thanks guys I decided to buy the stamps the dealer said any problems full refund, I should have them in my possession next week and will be sending a better scan to Bill Wiess for his quick 5 buck look at all three. If they are what they suppose to be I might send then to him and have them certified.

Here is a better pic I hope of the first stamp





Here is the second stamp hope the image is better to see

The first stamp is gone for certification well a online judgement by bill wiess.
I pretty sure the last stamp is a 35 so if the 32 comes back as a 32 then I pretty sure the 33 is also right

I sent scans to Mr wiess a few hours ago and just recived a email from him he states that the first stamp is a "It is type II, Scott #32" and the second Has yet to be sent to him pretty sure the last one is a 35

If the middle one is a #33 you will have a fine selection of this issue and will only need #31 and 34 to complete the set. The 34 is the most expensive of the five and 31 the second most expensive. I think it is wonderful that you obtained 3 of the five in one purchase. After many years, I still only have two of them.

Yes hopefully the middle is a 33 not to big a rush to so send it out for id, The americain stamps sure have a lot of interesting learning to them. Just getting started with my US collection it will take time know to find a 31 and 34.
But a big thanks guys I was almost ready to send them back even the dealer had relisted them but he pulled them from the auction and sent them to me. Me happy