Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

#265 With Purple Splotch On Back

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,673Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
146 Posts
Posted 10/18/2012   6:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add leoh to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I have a Scott #265 (or at least it is supposed to be, according to the seller) and when I put watermark fluid (Clarity from Mystic) a spot turns dark purple. When it dries it goes away. When the stamp is dry or wet with plain water that same area looks like a thin. Any thoughts on this?
Send note to Staff
Edited by leoh - 10/18/2012 7:00 pm

Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 10/18/2012   7:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It could be a repaired thin? Hard to say without seeing it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
146 Posts
Posted 10/18/2012   10:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add leoh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Finally got a chance to scan this. This is stamp as it looks dry. I can't get a scan with watermark fluid on it; evaporates too quickly.
The area that turns purple starts at the upper lip and goes to the left (as you look at the face of the stamp).




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 10/18/2012   10:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would guess the purplish spot is caused by the thin.

Drop some watermark fluid over the stamp face down, but this time don't put it in dark watermark tray. Just put it over some non-black surface and see if it is still "purplish".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 10/19/2012   06:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
While it's hard to confirm without seeing out in hand it would appear to be some sort of damage to G.W.'s lips like maybe a pin hole. Also, on the back it appears to either be a partial hinge, maybe a thin, or possible repair made with paper that had either sizing or chemical whiteners on it (eg: not stamp paper or newer stamp paper).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
146 Posts
Posted 10/19/2012   4:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add leoh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Using a white background with watermark fluid it shows up as NOT purple. You were right, khj, the black tray made the red appear purple. Live and learn. Thanks, folks.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4106 Posts
Posted 10/19/2012   9:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampvirgin to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
that stamp is not worth enough to do fakery on it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4087 Posts
Posted 10/19/2012   9:53 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
but a faker could've used it for practice
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 10/20/2012   05:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
most likely just a thin then.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
146 Posts
Posted 10/20/2012   1:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add leoh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The thing I'm most disappointed about is that it lacks a watermark, or at least I can't find one. I don't think this is a 265. Third time this has happened to me.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,673Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05