| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 2,023 |
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
30 Posts |
|
|
|
Is a Washington 1c Green stamp 9 1/2 x 9 1/2 perforations common or rare
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
809 Posts |
|
|
Share a 300+ pixel scan if you can. If you can do it with the perf gauge taht would be awesome as well. |
Send note to Staff
|
Member of the Central Oregon Stamp Club. Redmond, OR 97756 Mailer's Postmark Permit #1 APS 239403 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4091 Posts |
|
|
I don't think there are any 9 1/2 x 9 1/2, so either you have a bad perf gauge, or you made a mistake, or it is a fake. Some expert can correct me, but I am under the impression that the ones Scott lists as 10 x 10 actaully gauge a little less than 10, so yours may be 10 x 10 that you are having difficulty measuring. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
30 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1271 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10616 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2544 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
415 Posts |
|
|
Stewart,
have you got a better perforation gauge than that one, that type is useless, use a plastic gauge, they may cost a few $$$$'s but they work,
p.s. That's the 2nd. piece of advice you have been given to ask Bill Weiss,
Pagoda |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
809 Posts |
|
|
I prefer the clear plastic multi gauge
|
Send note to Staff
|
Member of the Central Oregon Stamp Club. Redmond, OR 97756 Mailer's Postmark Permit #1 APS 239403 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1942 Posts |
|
|
Save your money on the cert. In that first pic where you are setting it to the lines, I see less migration away from the reference point on the perf 10 than on the 9.5. If you sent it to Bill he would check it against a Kiusalas gauge. You can do something like that with one of the multiguage tools I see advertised. In days of yore, Stanley Gibbons came out with a metric based gauge that used angled lines and allowed readings to a tenth. If there is a paper shrinkage problem then a gauge like that would give you a reliable reading.
We're all pretty much saying the same thing. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
30 Posts |
|
|
Thank you all for your comments, in relation to the Perforation gauge used, it is a plastic gauge being a Trafalgar Series made in England, in relation to shrinkage, the Design Size still measures 19x22, which indicates no shrinkage.I will consult Bill Weiss, thanks again for all of your comments. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 2,023 |
|