Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Re : 408e .... Everyone Seen This One, Yet?

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 3,078Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1270 Posts
Posted 06/14/2014   4:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The wrapper around the roll states "1 C. (1-cent) stamps rolled lengthwise". #408 is hand written on the roll. 408(E) and 408(S) are older Scott Catalogue designation for todays Scott numbers 408V and 408H. 408E or 408V are the designations for a vertical (lengthwise) coil roll of imperforate Scott #408. 408V seems to be more common than 408H. This is of course assuming the hand written #408 on the wrapper is correct. If what's written is wrong, it could be 314V, 343V, or 383V. There were only 5 rolls of 314V made, I doubt it would be that one. There would be past-up pairs every 20 stamps in the roll.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 3,078Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05