Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Color Shades On US Classic Stamp Issues..how Best To Show?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,633Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community

United States
772 Posts
Posted 11/17/2014   12:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add DJCMHOH to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Scott's Specialized lists color shades for many classic US stamps, but they do not have their own minor letter listings. For example, on the 1898 Trans-Mississippi issue, you have 285 listed as dark yellow green, and then 2 shades listed : yellow green and green. These 2 shades are not given minor variety status.

So my question is how best to place these in the album I am making using lighhouse vario pages. Should I include the shades right after the base stamp, or should I keep the original set together and then group the shade varieties of all the values in the set in a separate section.

For the Trans-Mississippis this means having layouts that look like one of these two schematics

Version 1 (shades together with base value)

285-285 shade 1-285 shade 2
286-286 shade 1-286 shade 3
287-287 shade-288-288 shade
289-289 shade-290-290 shade
291-291 shade-292
293-293 shade

Version 2 (shades separated out)
285-286-287
288-289-290
291-292-293
285 shade 1-285 shade 2-286 shade 1-286 shade 2
287 shade-288 shade-289 shade-290 shade
291 shade-293 shade
Send note to Staff

Moderator
Learn More...
United States
12330 Posts
Posted 11/17/2014   12:55 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I like your version 1 because it allows an easier comparison of the color shades when viewing the page.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 11/17/2014   1:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This has been a question I have had regarding stamps from other countries as well. Generally I keep the set together with the main colors and add additional colors on the bottom, your Version 1.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1942 Posts
Posted 11/17/2014   3:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add essayk to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If you are able to determine the chronological sequence of each shade for each denomination, then you might be able to group them by set according to that chronology. That's a bit of a stretch for most folks. Failing that, I would group them by denomination with the earliest shade flanked by the recognized/listed other shades.

If you just want to follow the catalog and group according to the listed order, then your version 1 would get you there.

Version 2 has no good rationale behind it, inasmuch as the shades are not supplementary but rather reflect different printings. They are essentially different production states.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,633Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05