Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

219-D Postmark Question

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,108Next Topic  
Valued Member
175 Posts
Posted 01/01/2015   9:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add cet_gg to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Is it possible to find out what are the earliest postmarks for Scott 219D's? I have seen some people do have answers to what the earliest postmark on some stamps are. I do not know what resource to get the answer. An internet search does not give me the results. I don't know if I'm typing in the wrong question. Thank you for your help.
Send note to Staff

Rest in Peace
720 Posts
Posted 01/01/2015   9:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Glenn Estus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Try http://www.philamercury.com/board.php

You'll have to create an account before you can post a question, but most of the USA's greatest current postal historians regularly use the site.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 01/01/2015   9:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Scott Specialized Catalog often has a list of EKU (earliest known use) of postmarked covers for early US stamp issues.

As for Scott 219D, it was issued on February 22, 1890 and according to my 2013 Scott Specialized Catalog, there are known examples of a "first day cover" postmarked on that date which would, of course, be the EKU postmark for a Scott 219D. Remember, back in 1890 there was no philatelic "first day of issue" postmark as we know it today, so a regular postmark was used.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wt1 - 01/01/2015 9:24 pm
Valued Member
175 Posts
Posted 01/01/2015   9:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cet_gg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you Glenn and wrt. I don't have any 'first day covers' or postmarks on any stamps on the date of issue, until I reach the modern stamps, my mother added to the collection. I haven't left the 1800's to see what she collected, yet.

My 219D is the closet to the day of first issue, of the 'classics', I have. I admit to being happy to see some of these stamps postmarked the year they were issued, worthless monetary wise, as they may be. It's still neat, to me, to see a stamp that was not only issued a hundred years ago, but see the postmarks as old as they.

I will look into that site, Glenn. Thank you.

wrt, Scott Catalog, I don't know why I didn't look there. Newbie mind blank. I'm so 'into' looking at what I have, I'm not looking at what I have.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 01/01/2015   10:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I admit to being happy to see some of these stamps postmarked the year they were issued . . .


This just sounded like a very stamp collector thing to say.



Welcome to the club. ;)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
175 Posts
Posted 01/03/2015   09:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cet_gg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
smauggie, thank you for taking the time to say that. It means alot to me, and it's an honor to be here.

You could say, it's always been in my blood, as two of my ancestors were postmasters, I just came to it later in life. Had to get the other 'family traditions' (military service, teaching, etc.) out of the way, first, I guess.

I did collect some, as a child, when Gramps' collection was handed down to my mother, so I did 'knock on the club door' at one time. I appreciate you, and this community, opening the door, and welcoming me in.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
72 Posts
Posted 01/04/2015   02:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Moon to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply



Wow - thanks for that link. That's a treasure trove of postal history that I hadn't seen before.

One recent post there that stands out: (comments by poster Daniel M. Knowles):

http://www.philamercury.com/viewimg.php?id=52851

Patriotic cover bearing a strip of three of the 1861 1 ct stamp (63) cancelled "PAID" affixed over an uncanceled strip of three demonetized 1 ct blue (20), Type 11 from plate 12. Postmarked "SO MANCHESTER CT OCT. 14" (1861). Strip of #63 moved down slightly and hinged to reveal the #20 strip. Signed Asbrook. Illustrated in Don Evans book, page 161.

--------
edit: I should mention that the cover I linked is but one of a number of interesting covers that board members have posted recently as their favorite acquisitions of 2014. It's definitely worth checking out the rest if you have even a passing interest in postal history - that forum has material and knowledge on display that's worthy of a museum (as does this one).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Moon - 01/04/2015 12:33 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,108Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05