Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

New ID - Washington 2¢

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,967Next Topic  
Valued Member
139 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   08:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add nl1947 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Specs
Rotary - no ink on reverse
Type III
Perf 10.90 X 10.85
Size 19.7 X 22.3
No WMK
546?



*** Edited by Staff to clarify topic title. Titles are important! ***
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2545 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   10:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
my guess: SC 546
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
131 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   12:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chaulkdust to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes I believe you are correct - Scott 546
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   12:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cfrphoto to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The stamp is a type III with questionable perforations. The bottom margin perforations look bad and the right and left margins are not wide enough. It is likely that the stamp was a 492 type III perf 10 rotary coil reperforated 11 on all four sides.

Before condemning the stamp, the perforations should be examined in person by a qualified expert. PSAG will be at StampShow in August and CHICAGOPEX in November. The stamp can be sent in for expertizing to APS, PF, PSE or PSAG or to Bill Weiss for a quick lower cost evaluation. Even if the stamp comes back as a 546, it is unlikely to end up with a clean cert.

Clark
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
131 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   6:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chaulkdust to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Check where the cancellation crosses the perf holes. If you can magnify, then if the inside of the perf hole contains black ink if may not have been re-perfed on that side? However it could be touched up as well. A sloppy faker will just re-punch the perfs. The perfs look so ugly they may be ok? Like crfphoto said - Cert to be sure. Just something else to look at.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
131 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   7:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chaulkdust to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Just for the heck of it I measured one of my 546's. Measurement from the bottom of the perf holes width and height of the stamp. What I came up with was about 20 1/2mm Width and just under 23 3/4mm Height. See how yours compares. Does look a bit tight in the picture. I would think if you are way off that does not bode well? Once again just something to look at - may be worth nothing.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
139 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   7:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nl1947 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I can measure quite accurately
Got average of: 20.75 x 23.55

Looks like there is ink in the top right perf

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by nl1947 - 05/19/2015 7:35 pm
Valued Member
United States
131 Posts
Posted 05/19/2015   8:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chaulkdust to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by chaulkdust - 05/19/2015 8:46 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,967Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05