The cancel on the Edison appears to be missing in the LR corner where the corner is missing, which makes me think it was torn off after it was cancelled. The C6 does not appear damaged, or do you see something I am missing?
It's all but guaranteed to be thin (and possibly without gum when added as well, who knows). The Edison was probably the same, although all it really had to be was hinged heavily.
Quote: The C6 does not appear damaged, or do you see something I am missing?
No one would use an undamge example of of a C6 on a cover like this. There is a wrinkle/crease at the upper left by the you of US, and that is just what can be seen from the front. As someone eslse pointed out, it is most likely either thinned or it had no gum.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here
Posted 09/09/2015 02:15 am
