Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help With Scott Catalog Values

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,356Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
72 Posts
Posted 04/14/2009   10:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add John Paul to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hello,
I need some advice on using the Scott Catalog to understand stamp values. I inherited a stamp collection with a large wold stamp component. I check out some Scott catalogs from the library and am slowly cataloging what I have. I have dozens of stamps from the Republic of China (Taiwan) and from the Peoples' Republic of China that are in mint-hinged condition. They are from the 1960's on, so I should not use the MNH value in the Scott Catalog. Should I just assume they are the same as used stamps? Or somewhere between the used and unused values? Any insight would be helpful.

Thanks
,
John Paul
Send note to Staff
Edited by John Paul - 04/14/2009 10:06 pm

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1566 Posts
Posted 04/14/2009   10:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mkfarm to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Do you mean they have a hinge or that they do not have a hinge. Are the mint with gum or used with no gum?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by mkfarm - 04/14/2009 10:07 pm
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts
Posted 04/14/2009   10:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Paul to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry if I wasn't' clear:

The stamps have never been used and have full gum. At least for the ones I have checked, I have not peaked under all of them. None of this particular group have any postmark or cancellation. They all look brand new, at least to my uneducated eyes.

They have been hinged to put into a stamp album. In some cases I have a block of 3 or 4 stamps, in which 1 stamp or the selvage has a hinge, but the other stamps are not hinged.

John Paul
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2758 Posts
Posted 04/14/2009   10:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well, in short, use the used valve, that will be close.
There are at least 3 gradings of mint hinged;
1) Lightly hinged less the 20% gum damage
2) Heavily hinged (part gum) greater 20-80% gum damage
3) Remnants of hinge remain on stamps
All reduce from mint values, of course there are other condition factors
that effects value.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts
Posted 04/16/2009   11:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Paul to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the information - very helpful, as usual.
JP
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 04/16/2009   11:29 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
When you have a hinged stamp and only the MNH catalog value is given, by far the usual practice I see is that the catalog value for the MNH stamp is given and the stamp is clearly listed by the seller as being hinged (Warrehouse has already posted the usual classifications for levels of hinging). It's up to the buyer to decide how much they want to pay for a previously hinged stamp. Of course, if the hinged price if given in the catalog, you should cite the hinged price and again state the hinging level (because the Scott catalog value for hinged stamps is for LH=lightly hinged).

If you examine the MNH and MLH prices when given in Scott for the older issues, you will see that the LH price is typically 1/3 to 1/2 the NH price. So that will give you a rough idea for older stamps and modern PREMIUM stamps.

The modern COMMON mint stamps will have a MUCH larger drop in value. Typically what I see for modern common mint LH is 10%-25% of MNH catalog value or 75%-100% of face value, whichever is higher. Those are my general observations and it's easy to find exceptions. Others may have a different experience.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,356Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05