| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,604 |
|
|
New Member
1 Posts |
|
|
I cannot tell if this stamp was hinged or just stuck to another stamp. What do you guys think? Its a 1918 24 cent carmine and blue aimail unused scott # c3.  -the scans got cut off a little 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
907 Posts |
|
|
Looks like somebody bent over the selvedge and tried to place the hinge on it instead of the stamp itself. Unfortunately, there seems to have been a little bit of overflow. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Yes, it does look like the bottom of the stamp is a selvage folded over, it got stuck, and somebody tried to remove the stuck selvage but was only partially successful. It also looks like to me that the stamp might have a hinge mark/remnant along the top.   k |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by khj - 08/01/2009 3:08 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
576 Posts |
|
|
This poor jewel is probably the victim of a number of lickings. I tend to agree with the selvage idea. I've seen cases of it before. It may have occurred as a result of too much humidity while hinged. I've also witnessed samples of this. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
USA
3315 Posts |
|
|
It's sad to see the back since the front looks so nice - still, it's a really good filler for almost any collection. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2758 Posts |
|
|
I'm sorry to say it's a filler only stamp, beside hing damage on the back of the stamp, it's off-centering leading to cutting off the right edge of the design. The colors of the stamp is great!
Mike |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by warrehouse - 08/19/2009 6:32 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts |
|
|
it is my understanding that the scanner cut off the edges, not that the stamp has straight edges. Am I thinking correctly?
I have several stamps, particularly in the classic era with absolutely gorgeous fronts, but the backs have problems. Since I don't look at the back of the stamps, and I don't care about the resale value, what's the problem? WHich had you rather have, a stamp with an absolutely problem free back, but with a scrape on the front, or a perfect front with a scrape on the back? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
127 Posts |
|
|
That's a beautiful stamp. Don't worry about the back. Most of here are collectors, not resellers. This copy would look good in anyone's collection. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1259 Posts |
|
|
hawks9 As A collector I would have this stamps based on the front. An investor(Which I am not)would stay away from this because of the re-sale value. A nice set to collect. David(DJD) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1259 Posts |
|
|
PS Another good reason to collect used. my criteria for Fine Used Is : Fine or better Centering. Free of frontal damage, scuffs,tears, missing perforation. Light cancel ,preferably town dated copies. David(DJD)
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts |
|
|
I'm with you David(DJD) I guess I am an adherent of the beaury is skin deep theory. lol. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,604 |
|