Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help Searching On Ebay

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 2,909Next Topic
Page: of 2
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts
Posted 05/05/2010   12:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BeeSee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Oh of course bobby131313, I should have done that. In my example I originally had one neg, and after previewing it I cut and pasted a couple more. Still works anyway.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
BeeSee in BC
"The Postmark is Mightier than the Stamp"
http://brcstamps.com ---- BNAPS, RPSC, APS
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts
Posted 05/05/2010   12:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BeeSee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
To smoothen the code as per Bobby:

(1695*,1696*,1697*,1698*,1699*,1700*,1701*,1702*,"$1 loon","$2 polar","$5 moose","$8 grizzly","$1 deer","$1 walrus","$2 falcon","$2 horse") -(flag,flags,"maple leaf",atm) +canada
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
BeeSee in BC
"The Postmark is Mightier than the Stamp"
http://brcstamps.com ---- BNAPS, RPSC, APS
Edited by BeeSee - 05/05/2010 12:54 pm
Rest in Peace
Canada
6750 Posts
Posted 05/05/2010   1:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Puzzler to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Bee See, My apologies, it does avoid categories.

Bobby, thanks good tip indeed.

I agree about the useless wasted space lot number business but sellers running businesses that have to report to Revenue Canada or the IRS or some such entity do have to keep their books in order for them and lot numbers are a easy but confusing way to do it. For them. For searchers it is maddening.

I do not use lot numbers. I divide each months sales into it's own database (my limited knowledge of databases comes into play here) so even if I use a similar title the date will keep it all separate.

The revenuers do want and like things to be sorted by day and month anyway.

Another point, the space allowed for a title on ebay is limiting to sellers for describing their stamp items. I do wish ebay would increase the length of title allowed like on their rival DelCampe, thus increasing the chances of a better described item or at least an item title that has more terms to search for in it.

Simple is nice and maybe most people don't read a long title but it sure does help when searching. If one person searches for letter and another only searches for cover and a third searches for a strange term like Missive then a seller needs to, in order to reach a wide as possible an audience, include many terms in his titles. Simple eh?

So, if the title is only so long because people don't read past the forth word or something like that then . . .oh bother. I think I should start up my own ebay and hire Bobby. Probably too late.

The Pond, aka The Puzzler's Pond, the New place to Find what you need!

edit: typos and abbreviations
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Puzzler - 05/05/2010 6:14 pm
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts
Posted 05/05/2010   1:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BeeSee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Puzzler, you are right about the limited space ebay has in the description field. That is what makes useless wasted space lot numbers some sellers add so useless, they are taking away valuable real estate that should be helping, not hindering the searcher. I remember one seller who had his own lot number AND user I.D. in his description - I sent him a scathing email!

I work with databases and programming: it is so simple to keep track: Use the ebay assigned number! And as you said Puzzler, add your own number if you like in your own database!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
BeeSee in BC
"The Postmark is Mightier than the Stamp"
http://brcstamps.com ---- BNAPS, RPSC, APS
Edited by BeeSee - 05/05/2010 1:48 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 05/05/2010   5:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Whew!
Is SCF the place, or not?

There has been substantial effort in this thread, and I would like
to thank Puzzler, Ryan and everybody else.
Fantastic and very much appreciated.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
Canada
6750 Posts
Posted 05/05/2010   6:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Puzzler to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Rod and Bee See and Bobby amd Ryan, I am always learning and it is good to see other viewpoints. Broadens one's appreciation of what is possible.

Thank you also to this forum for being here.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts
Posted 05/06/2010   06:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rohumpy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Who knew that such an innocent(?) question would produce this response. Thanks all. Most informative, and I think that now I will have a better idea of how to search.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 2,909Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05