| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 7,908 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts |
|
|
I agree with Tony on being old-fashioned. I use a perf guage all the time. Though I must say Rod's formula is extremely useful when you can find the measurement of the stamp image. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts |
|
|
I prefer to "Do the Math", as I find it quicker. I have the formula saved in my calculator. I measure the stamp plug in the size, count the holes, plug the number in then hit Engage! Quote: Though I must say Rod's formula is extremely useful when you can find the measurement of the stamp image. Using the perforation gauge is extremely useful - when I can find it  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts |
|
|
A couple of comments:
- If you have the image scanned, then presumably you must have manhandled the stamp onto and off your scanner, and back into storage, in the first place. That rather seems to defeat the purpose of the exercise. - I keep all my stamps in stockbooks, with anything of particular value in a mount, so I can avoid damaging it when I'm handling it. I must say, though, I can't recall ever damaging a stamp while measuring its perfs ... damaging stamps in other ways, oh yes: jabbing them with my tweezers, shoving them carelessly under the strips in my stockbook, dropping them on the floor and running over them with the castors on my chair, allowing the cat to convert them into toys. But for me, the essence of stamp collecting is the stamps themselves, not their images. - The vanishing perf gauge: That is one of life's little mysteries. I don't know how the cat does it, but when she isn't re-perforating my stamps, she's carrying away my perf gauge and concealing it in places no human would ever think to look. That's why I have two of them - perf gauges, that is. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
|
|
I need to find me a new perf gauge. I use the cheap black one I got from Mystic a long time ago. This one is pretty good for common perfs but I have a problem when it comes to the stamps that have fraction perfs or if the stamp is on cover. I can handle the 1/2 but when it gets to the odd fractions and the self adhesive stamps it gets harder. It seems to much trouble to scan a stamp just to check perfs. That is just me though. I just started scanning. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts |
|
|
Eopie, you are a prime candidate for a small plastic metric ruler and a calculator  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
|
|
When I get home I am going to give it a try on a few stamps. Maybe I can get rid of that bag of odd perfs finally :) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
USA
3315 Posts |
|
|
What's this calculator thing? I still use a slide rule!
I'm with eoipe - I use a pretty sophisticated gauge and it can still be really difficult to tell the fractional sized perfs apart. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
737 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
Canada
5701 Posts |
|
Replies: 25 / Views: 7,908 |
|