Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Stamp Prices In Catalogues

Next Page    
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 39 / Views: 2,248Next Topic
Page: of 3
Valued Member
51 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   06:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add mazdoc to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Recently I have realized that the prices in the catalogues are somewhat useless. This is not specific to a certain catalogue, and maybe the prices of US and UK stamps are reflective of the market prices.
Lebanese stamps for example are very much over priced in the catalogues as compared to what the stamps sell between collectors.

Stamps are a commodity subject to supply and demand. A person can put any price on a stamp, but if there is no demand, the stamp with a high price will remain unsold.

What do you think? Have you encountered unreasonable catalogue prices? Do you use catalogue prices when buying and selling stamps?
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
37468 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   07:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I only use catalogues to organise and identify my stamps.
Value comes with investigation eBay or auction.

Naturally you see a stamp valued highly in a catalogue,
that can alert you to a possible scarcity.

Establishing a price you are prepared to pay comes from
watching sales
Basically I use 25% of Scott for a rough guage
add or subtract for scarcity or condition.

I just this day demounted about 400 Lebanese stamps from
an US Cardboard "Elbe" stocksheet
Estimated cost ( from an "worldwide" collection from my dealer)

Lots of duplication, and condition, but a nice winter's day sorting.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 09/07/2022 07:11 am
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
9471 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   07:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
In the beginning (not to sound biblical) catalog prices were tied to dealer price lists and for rare items, auction results. Now there is enormous data available from internet trading and if you throw out the high and low anomalistic prices asked and paid you find a real value. I think catalog values have a place as ROM's which give a base or rough value to base an analysis on . Nothing more. It always comes back to supply and demand and dealer price lists never truly reflected real sales.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Learn More...
United States
11219 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   10:42 am  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I am a bit more cynical and think that catalog publishers have numerous motivations to increase catalog values (year over year) and very little incentive to publish accurate market values. It is my opinion that if a publisher were to now revise their catalog values to reflect the much lower actual market values their sales would suffer (both deceased catalog sales and loss of advertising dollars).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   10:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stephen J Bukowy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I don't use the catalogs for anything but identification. Even if the prices were accurate when published (doubtful at best) they likely are not now. The market determines the value and that is constantly changing.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
6295 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   11:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add floortrader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I don't think there is a right answer to this question . Too many things have changed in the market place and do we really understand all the changes taking place .

We got a lot of old timers here who remember dealer price lists and full page ads in stamp newspapers , then we also got those who see the world thru eBay and other online market places .

The only bright spot that I see in the market place {remember like everybody else I have a limited view of what's going on} is the price increases at stamp auctions of massive worldwide collections where the price was 2 or 3 cents a few years ago per stamp and over the last few auctions they are now getting over 10 cents each per stamp . Catalog pricing has nothing to do with this change .

The only reason I buy new catalogs {I just bought the Scott 2021 set } is because my old set is beat up and falling apart at Rasdale Auctions a few weeks ago . Pricing is not a factor in these new catalogs ,a few up and a few down .

I believe most catalogs are going to call it quits in the next few years and limit their scope to what they keep track of .
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
874 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   1:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add classic_paper to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Recently I have realized that the prices in the catalogues are somewhat useless.

You're obviously new to the hobby. This is a realization that all philatelists arrive at pretty quickly.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
422 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   2:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Willwood42 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
But here is a question that I have. How do the prices in Stampworld compare to the prices in Scott. When swapping stamps, one is asked to put down the catalog value, so a fair accounting can be done. I have a 1992 hard copy of Scott's that I use for identification and to keep a record of what I have. I also have a 2006 digital version. I don't feel like buying another copy just to be able to input the Scott values. Would much prefer to use Stampworld if there is a strong correlation
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8236 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   2:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Stampworld is mostly priced what a dealer would charge.
If you swap stamps by catalog value it does not really matter what catalog you use, as long as both partners use the same listings,

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
4817 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   2:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add redwoodrandy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Great question mazdoc. Keep asking your thoughtful questions. Very relevant. Never hesitate to ask.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
4756 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   2:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Semantics: "price vs value". Scott has not been a price list backed up by a sales stock since 1940. It is a value list. Small shade of difference, but I think important.

Also, Scott lists a value for a higher grade standard than typically encountered in an average collection. Thus many will discount Scott's listing to reflect this. The coin world is much better about value lists for degrees of condition. IMO, Scott would better serve the hobby by incorporating their "values by grade" list within the regular listings to more closely resemble a coin catalog. It would provide a more transparent picture to the beginner or inheritor trying to get an idea of value. The value by grade data is too hidden.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 09/07/2022 2:55 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
9471 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   3:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Linn's had an excellent article on this very topic:

One of the primary functions of a stamp catalog is to value stamps. That sounds pretty simple and straightforward, but it really isn't.

There are two basic systems for assigning catalog values: retail values and reference values.

Before embarking upon a transaction based on catalog value, you should make sure which kind of valuing system the catalog in question uses.

Stamp catalogs that use retail values, such as various Scott catalogs, are actually in the minority in the world of stamp collecting. For example, most European catalogs are based on a reference value system.

Scott catalog values are based on actual retail transactions and represent what you can reasonably expect to pay in the retail market for an undamaged stamp in a very fine grade. For example, the 2/6 Allegory of Charity semipostal stamp, New South Wales Scott B2, shown in Figure 1, has a Scott catalog value of $200 for unused, hinged and in the VF grade (centering).

Although the stamp sold for 2/6, it had a postage value of only 2d.

What should you expect to pay for it if you buy it from a retail stamp dealer in this condition and grade? You should expect to pay $200.

If you own this stamp and you want to sell it to a dealer, how much could you expect him to pay you for it? That is an entirely different question. The answer depends on a number of different factors, including how badly the dealer needs it to replenish his stock and how quickly he thinks he will be able to resell it.

If you do not understand what the word "retail" means, you are liable to come to grief in your stamp transactions.

The dictionary definition of retail is "to sell in small quantities to the ultimate customer." You, the collector are the ultimate customer. The stamp dealer is the retailer.

Collectors buy from dealers at retail prices. Dealers, if they want to remain in business, will not buy from collectors at anywhere near retail prices.

Many collectors remember when the Scott catalogs made the transition in the late 1980s (in the 1989 and 1990 editions) from a reference value system to the retail value system, accompanied as it was by much weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth from some dealers and collectors.

For an example of the change from reference to retail catalog values, consider the 1 blue-green King Edward VII stamp, Great Britain Scott 142, shown in Figure 2.

An unused, hinged example with reasonable centering was still valued at $2,000 in the 1989 Scott Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue. In the 1990 edition, it was at $1,000 for a stamp in a grade of fine-very fine. Today the Scott retail value for a VF example of this stamp is $1,200.

Note also that the catalog standard for grading went from "reasonable centering" for 1989 and earlier to F-VF in 1990. Beginning with the 1997 Scott catalog, values are for stamps in the grade of VF.

The change in catalog values from 1988-89 to 1990 was not the result of a decline in marketplace prices but the result of the change from reference values to retail catalog values.

Dealers' and collectors' objections to the change were mostly psychological.

Some dealers felt that going to a retail valuing system took away their ability to wheel and deal. For those addicted to dickering, the retail value system seemed just too straightforward. Some collectors had a hard time getting over the mental barrier of having to pay about full Scott catalog value for stamps after years, or even decades, of buying their stamps at a percentage of Scott values. After all, for much of their collecting lives, anyone who paid full catalog for a stamp was considered to be either desperate to acquire or a bit of a fool.

Today there can still be dickering using the retail value system, but now it focuses on condition and grade rather than on the catalog values themselves.

Today when you hear a collector boasting about acquiring a stamp from a dealer at a steep discount from Scott value, look closely at the stamp. The explanation for the discount can often be found in its condition and grade.

A handful of dealers continued to use the 1988 edition of the Scott catalog for valuing for quite a few years after it was published.

There are cheaper ways to acquire stamps than buying them one at a time at retail catalog value. For instance, you can acquire large numbers of stamps by buying accumulations, collections, kiloware or stamp packets. Of course, some of the stamps acquired in this way will be damaged, heavily canceled or poorly centered, and there may be quite a bit of duplication.

This still can be the most cost-effective way of acquiring low-catalog-value stamps, especially if you can trade the duplicates to other collectors.

But don't expect to turn around and sell these stamps to a dealer for retail catalog value, or anywhere near it.

The Scott minimum catalog value of 20 is designed to pay the dealer for his time and effort in identifying and stocking the stamp. Stamps valued at the minimum catalog value are not, in and of themselves, really worth 20.

For higher-catalog-value stamps, the best way to acquire them is usually one at a time, paying very close attention to the individual stamp's grade and condition.

It should remain uppermost in your mind that Scott catalog values are for undamaged stamps in VF condition. Stamps in lower grades sell at a discount from Scott catalog values, if they sell at all.

Classic stamps in extremely fine condition can sell for more than Scott catalog value, sometimes considerably more.

Buying at auction is also a different proposition from buying stamps at retail, one at a time from a dealer.

Depending on the material and how it is presented by the auctioneer, you may pay considerable less than catalog value for an auction lot, or you might have to pay considerably more.

In a catalog that uses a reference value system, both the prospective buyer and the prospective seller understand that the catalog value is not a retail value. It is an abstract value assigned to show the relative value of stamps in relation to each other.

For example, a stamp with a reference value of 5 is five times as valuable as a stamp with a reference value of 1.

Reference catalog values are always higher than retail values, sometimes by as much as 100 percent. Dealers using reference-value catalogs understand that, and they discount the prices at which they sell the stamps by standard percentages.

A VF, undamaged stamp with a reference catalog value of 5 from a catalog with a discount rate of 50 percent, would normally sell at retail for about 2.50.

The standard discount varies from catalog publisher to catalog publisher.

If you are looking to acquire stamps valued by a catalog that uses reference values, you must first find out what the standard discount for that catalog is. If you paid full catalog value from a reference value catalog, you probably paid too much.

For example, the 200-piaster green and black Sultan Mohammed V stamp, Turkey Scott 270, shown in Figure 3, has a Scott catalog value of $550 in unused, hinged condition and in a VF grade.

The same stamp is listed in the 2003-04 German-language Michel Europe Catalog, Vol. 4, South Europe, as No. 245 and is valued in the same condition and grade at 1,000.

The exchange rate for the euro stood at $1 to 1.112 in September 2003, when the Michel catalog was published, so the Michel catalog value for the stamp equates to $1,112.

Although catalog values in foreign currencies will always be affected by exchange-rate fluctuations, as you can see from this comparison, the Michel catalogs use reference values, not retail values.

The lack of a direct connection between reference catalog values and the retail marketplace was starkly illustrated by the remarks of Albertino de Figueiredo, president of the Afinsa Group, in the No. 84 (2003) issue of Flash, the journal of the International Federation of Philately (FIP).

The Spanish-based Afinsa Group publishes the Domfil line of catalogs and owns major stakes in various high-profile auction firms and in new-issue selling.

The cover of a Domfil Europa CEPT Thematic Stamp Catalogue is shown in Figure 4.

In his editorial, De Figueiredo said that one of a catalog publisher's key responsibilities is to "resist temptation" and "abstain from lowering prices."

De Figueiredo said: "The reduction of stamp prices has a devastating affect it removes value from both dealers' stocks and from collectors' holdings. We must not forget that a stamp collector is also an investor . . . stamps have interesting financial returns and they can be used to solve financial problems without having to turn to bank loans or mortgages. On the contrary, we should ensure that prices rise."

Further, de Figueiredo states that such a policy "creates loyalty among collectors and remunerates dealers appropriately."

One of the facts of life of the retail marketplace is that prices sometimes go up and they sometimes go down.

This philosophy of setting catalog values differs markedly from that of the Scott catalog editors, whose primary goal is to reflect the reality of the marketplace.

If a catalog publisher is dedicated to the proposition that his catalog values will never go down, then they obviously are not a reflection of the retail market.

I don't mean to imply that catalog publishers who use the reference value system are being underhanded. I do mean to say that it is a different system, and collectors should understand the system before they attempt to use it.

If you are buying stamps from a dealer who bases his prices on a reference-value catalog, it is always a good idea to check his prices against Scott to see where they stand.

Many country catalogs list and value stamps that are not listed and valued by Scott. In those cases, direct comparisons are not possible. But you can average the differences from several other items that are listed by both catalogs to get a good idea of the discount percentage that applies to the catalog, and use that percentage to check the prices for items not listed by Scott.

Okay, collectors, come on down for a philatelic installment of The Price Is Right.

The VF, unused Korean 1-won Yin Yang stamp, Scott 32, shown in Figure 5, has a Scott catalog value of $750 and a Michel catalog value of 1,110.

How much would you expect to pay for it in a retail transaction with a stamp dealer?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2368 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   3:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add NSK to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with John Becker. I would add that if you collect GB or commonwealth stamps, you will find that the Stanley Gibbons catalogues are most widely used. Those are price lists. Stanley Gibbons sells stamps in very fine condition at those prices and guarantees them. Any other dealer will offer the same stamps at a discount. If they would sell at that price, I would prefer Stanley Gibbons as it gives me more certainty.

As John remarks, quality (grade has no meaning in Europe) does make a difference. Stampworld, probably, is a better reflection of market prices. However, the few times I looked for a value, it was wishful thinking. Either the stamp could not be found anywhere near that price for years, or the stamps that came close to the Stampworld price were either questionable (try to find a UK watermark on Delcampe if the stamp is offered by a non-UK seller), or utter garbage.

As for Don's scepticism, I can imagine that with the NVPH catalogue. This is a catalogue of Dutch stamps issued by the association of Dutch stamp dealers. Classic stamps are highly overvalued. Even big dealers, now, offer most stamps at 40% or less of catalogue value. However, NVPH offers an expertising service. The fee is based on the catalogue value. Take the 1949 'en face' permanent series of Queen Juliana. It is catalogued at around 1,500. It is easy to find the set at less than 600 and in very good quality. The high values, you should buy with a certificate. A set percentage of 1,500 generates a lot more revenue than that percentage of 600.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1478 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   6:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blcjr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Don wrote:

(both deceased catalog sales and loss of advertising dollars)

He may have meant "decreased catalog sales."

But then again, maybe not.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
50 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   6:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Mainer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Great question and lot's of great feedback here. I've wondered this too. Is it possible to know how rigorous the valuation process is behind these different listings? It's one thing to say it is "based on sales" but how are they assessing that? How much real data is there? Or is it just BOGSAT (bunch of guys sitting around a table)?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3157 Posts
Posted 09/07/2022   8:49 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I use cat value as a reference point. If one stamp cats $25 and another $50, I would expect to pay (or get) roughly twice as for the second one, but I would expect to pay (or get) 100% of cat value.
With experience you start to get a feel for what the % should be for a particular quality level, although unfortunately I found that % varies from one country to the next, and within a country you can find some exceptions too).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 39 / Views: 2,248Next Topic  
Next Page
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05