Russian - More Stamps - Thanks

What about Sc# 283? check Perf size #283A

thank you so your opinion is typo printing
this is confusing regarding those stamps where something's fit as typo and others fit as litho on the same stamp
the perf is 141/4:143/4

I am only reading Scott.
Wmk should dictate the issue?

Type A58: Lithographed. The two white lines forming the outline of the ear are continued across the cheek. Typographed. The outer ines of the ear are broken where they touch the cheek.
I'll have a browse through Gibbons.

Update:
Nope, has me nobbled
To me your stamp looks litho, but by the perf guage, and relief at back
it would be Typo 1924-1925 (P14 x 14½), or if wmk 1925-1927

Time to leave it to the experts
Check your wnmk, you may have Sc# 311a

Here is my used example, from my digital collection
Typo

i do thank you and a lot of compliments to you rod222
i did a small comparison using your 8ktypo 8klitho from cherrystone and my 8k just cut a way the perfs so to better focus on the main points which highlighted I also added a scan from lyapin as well as a scan of my 8k back side to show wm an iam not 100% sure but I think its vertical but have a look youself thanks and looking forward to your opinion

i need to apologize for my mistake inthe above post regarding the first image 3rd stamp (cherrystone) is typo NOT litho

here is another cccp stamp thats difficult to id 1k imperforated and unwm but with postmark cancel dated 3 May 1924 all opinions are very welcome

istamp, that looks like a cutout from a piece of postal stationary.

Peter

Istamp,
until we get a specialist opinion I came to the conclusion your stamp is a Stanley Gibbons 437a (The most valuable example of this stamp)
You really need to confirm the watermark
Good Luck

Here are the options of that type.

Just so we do not get all confused. I was referring to the yellow/orange stamp. Rod, you were still talking about the brown ones.

Peter

Yep, understood Pete. Thanks.

The orange stamp could be..........

Stanley Gibbons SG# 335 Type 90 October 1923
(Value expressed in gold currency zolotom)
Wove Paper
No Watermark
Imperf
Lithographed

It may be suggested Lithography, there is a period after first "KOP"

"Istamp,until we get a specialist opinion I came to the conclusion your stamp is a Stanley Gibbons 437a (The most valuable example of this stamp)
You really need to confirm the watermark
Good Luck"

rod222, thank you and my compliments again for your support and great help
i like reading what you wrote but iam very sceptic all the time and also lost my (ill find some rarity one day ) sun glasses
i even dont know which ru expert to contact cause I think its important also

here are some scans regarding the gold issue by rossica that I found yesterday quite interesting

"The orange stamp could be..........
Stanley Gibbons SG# 335 Type 90 October 1923
(Value expressed in gold currency zolotom)
Wove Paper No Watermark Imperf Lithographed
It may be suggested Lithography, there is a period after first "KOP" "

thank you rod222 for your help
iam adding a scan from lyapin regarding the 1k worker stamp and also the scan of stamps back side for complete view thanks again for your help

iam adding two 20k stamps both perforated 141/4:143/4 and watermarked but the first one looks like a small head but I easily could be wrong
all opinions are very welcome thanks

rod222 regarding the 8k stamp iam now sure that it has this vertical wm thanks

Well, congratulations Istamp,
appears you have Sc# 311a CV $100 2009

Some reading
http://www.stamp-collecting-world.c...s_1923d.html