| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,051 |
|
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts |
|
|
A friend of mine knows that here lately I've been working with some stamps from Austria. He emailed this picture to me and was wondering if I could help him identify these four:  Here were my thoughts: #1 - Austrian Offices Abroad, Offices of the Turkish Empire. Either Scott 4 or 7F. With the pen markings it is difficult to see if the beard is coarse or fine. #2 - Looks like an imperforate of Scott 112. The Scott catalog mentioned that all of that 1908-1913 series exists as imperforate. #3 - Appears to be an Austrian Newspaper stamp. That was as far as I could go. #4 - Not a clue on this one..... Of course, once I hit the wall on the ID I immediately thought of you all and thought I would see if anyone could go a little deeper on the ID's. Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
#1 -- looks like revenue usage not postal usage, too small to determine coarse/fine print type. However, the coarse print 10 soldi was only issued perf 9.5. So if is any other perforation, then it must be #7F. If it is perf 9.5, it can still be either #4 or #7F.
The remaining 3 will not be Scott listed.
#2 -- cut square, not the imperforate stamp #3 -- revenue stamp #4 -- probably revenue stamp (I don't collect revenues and am unfamiliar with this one) |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by khj - 12/23/2011 3:12 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts |
|
|
khj - thanks for the info on the first one. You mentioned that on #2 it was a cut square. How is that different from an imperforate stamp? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts |
|
|
A cut square is a preprinted stamp cut from a piece of postal stationery. Think of a post card or envelope. Scott lists U.S. examples, but generally speaking, the major catalogues don't list postal stationery items.
An imperf stamp is still a stamp, and will be listed in the major catalogues. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Cut square, see "mutilated stationery" here for further reading... https://goscf.com/t/19277Number 3 is a straight receipts revenue Forbin #317 1893 CV 3c in 1915 Stempel Marke pour acquit de tous droits.  Number 4 I cannot find anywhere can we have a better scan by itself please? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 12/24/2011 12:59 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Quote: "mutilated stationery" I still get a chuckle every time I read that!  k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts |
|
|
I guess my confusion then comes from the statement in the Scott catalog: "All values exist imperforate". How would you know by looking at the stamp if it were cut from postal stationary or not? The margin differences??  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts |
|
|
Design, color, value, paper characteristics, margins, writing on the back. Lots of different possible ways to tell the difference, and yes, sometimes it can still be hard to tell. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: by looking at the stamp if it were cut from postal stationary or not? A lot of time by feel. Thin brown paper generally Newspaper wrapper thicker paper , envelope thicker still, postcard. Can we have a close up number 4 please? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 12/24/2011 01:00 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts |
|
|
rod - this scan was the only one that was sent to me. I can try to see if he can send me a better image of just number 4. And thanks everyone for the detailed information. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts |
|
|
There wasn't a lot of resolution there to play with, but here is a bigger view to tide us over 'til a new scan arrives.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Hmm, that background rectangle appears to have faded giving a strange look to the label. I was racking my brains for countries using the double headed eagle Russia Albania Hungary Austria Prussia any other suggestions? (tied with the Kroner)? or can we definitely say it is Austria? Nothing of Austria in Byrom Nothing similar in Forbin.
The design looks wonky to me the lower frame design is not even both sides suggesting there was a fitted image in the centre that has faded or not printed.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts |
|
|
I was thinking Austria, because of its general similarities to other Austrian revenues, and I was seeing (imagining?) the W I E at the bottom of the cancel, which would fit WIEN just about perfectly. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts |
|
|
The new one purports to be Thurn and Taxis, Southern District. I have a list of forgery spotting features that I'll dig out. (Forgeries are common.) I think I also have a list of numeral cancels for T&T.
[edit: My numeral list is just simple text, without any title or explanation, so I can't rule out a difference between northern and southern district numerals...anyway, my list shows 218 as "(Bad) Homburg vor der Höhe" and 248 as "Vacha". In person, it may be more obvious which this is. For what its worth.] |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Cjd - 12/26/2011 12:21 pm |
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,051 |
|