Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Austrian ID?

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,053Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts
Posted 12/23/2011   3:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add RonD to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
A friend of mine knows that here lately I've been working with some stamps from Austria. He emailed this picture to me and was wondering if I could help him identify these four:




Here were my thoughts:

#1 - Austrian Offices Abroad, Offices of the Turkish Empire. Either Scott 4 or 7F. With the pen markings it is difficult to see if the beard is coarse or fine.

#2 - Looks like an imperforate of Scott 112. The Scott catalog mentioned that all of that 1908-1913 series exists as imperforate.

#3 - Appears to be an Austrian Newspaper stamp. That was as far as I could go.

#4 - Not a clue on this one.....

Of course, once I hit the wall on the ID I immediately thought of you all and thought I would see if anyone could go a little deeper on the ID's. Any help would be appreciated.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 12/23/2011   3:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
#1 -- looks like revenue usage not postal usage, too small to determine coarse/fine print type. However, the coarse print 10 soldi was only issued perf 9.5. So if is any other perforation, then it must be #7F. If it is perf 9.5, it can still be either #4 or #7F.

The remaining 3 will not be Scott listed.

#2 -- cut square, not the imperforate stamp
#3 -- revenue stamp
#4 -- probably revenue stamp (I don't collect revenues and am unfamiliar with this one)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 12/23/2011 3:12 pm
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts
Posted 12/23/2011   4:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add RonD to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
khj - thanks for the info on the first one. You mentioned that on #2 it was a cut square. How is that different from an imperforate stamp?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts
Posted 12/23/2011   11:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A cut square is a preprinted stamp cut from a piece of postal stationery. Think of a post card or envelope. Scott lists U.S. examples, but generally speaking, the major catalogues don't list postal stationery items.

An imperf stamp is still a stamp, and will be listed in the major catalogues.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   12:08 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Cut square, see "mutilated stationery" here for further reading...
https://goscf.com/t/19277

Number 3 is a straight receipts revenue
Forbin #317 1893
CV 3c in 1915

Stempel Marke pour acquit de tous droits.



Number 4 I cannot find anywhere
can we have a better scan by itself please?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/24/2011 12:59 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   12:30 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
"mutilated stationery"

I still get a chuckle every time I read that!

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   12:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add RonD to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I guess my confusion then comes from the statement in the Scott catalog: "All values exist imperforate". How would you know by looking at the stamp if it were cut from postal stationary or not? The margin differences??
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   12:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Design, color, value, paper characteristics, margins, writing on the back. Lots of different possible ways to tell the difference, and yes, sometimes it can still be hard to tell.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   12:58 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
by looking at the stamp if it were cut from postal stationary or not?



A lot of time by feel.

Thin brown paper generally Newspaper wrapper
thicker paper , envelope
thicker still, postcard.

Can we have a close up number 4 please?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/24/2011 01:00 am
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   01:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply


Your 3 Heller, looks like a newspaper wrapper,
it should feel thin and flimsy.

Here is one (precancelled)
http://www.precancels.org/foreign/a...ianwraps.htm



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   09:51 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add RonD to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
rod - this scan was the only one that was sent to me. I can try to see if he can send me a better image of just number 4. And thanks everyone for the detailed information.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   10:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There wasn't a lot of resolution there to play with, but here is a bigger view to tide us over 'til a new scan arrives.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   10:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hmm, that background rectangle appears to have faded
giving a strange look to the label.
I was racking my brains for countries using
the double headed eagle
Russia
Albania
Hungary
Austria
Prussia
any other suggestions? (tied with the Kroner)?
or can we definitely say it is Austria?
Nothing of Austria in Byrom
Nothing similar in Forbin.

The design looks wonky to me
the lower frame design is not even both sides
suggesting there was a fitted image in the centre that
has faded or not printed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts
Posted 12/24/2011   10:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I was thinking Austria, because of its general similarities to other Austrian revenues, and I was seeing (imagining?) the W I E at the bottom of the cancel, which would fit WIEN just about perfectly.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
106 Posts
Posted 12/26/2011   10:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add RonD to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here is another larger image of number 4. I guess he also ran into another one he couldn't identify. He scanned that one as well and included it. I guess I'll call that one number 5.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7073 Posts
Posted 12/26/2011   11:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The new one purports to be Thurn and Taxis, Southern District. I have a list of forgery spotting features that I'll dig out. (Forgeries are common.) I think I also have a list of numeral cancels for T&T.


[edit: My numeral list is just simple text, without any title or explanation, so I can't rule out a difference between northern and southern district numerals...anyway, my list shows 218 as "(Bad) Homburg vor der Höhe" and 248 as "Vacha". In person, it may be more obvious which this is. For what its worth.]
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Cjd - 12/26/2011 12:21 pm
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,053Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05