Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Need Help With Charkhari Stamp

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,686Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1927 Posts
Posted 01/20/2012   11:16 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Triggersmob to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I am not familiar with these stamps, so I would like to know if it is real, the SG number (if think SG51), the value and any other info please.





Thanks

Steve
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 01/21/2012   06:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Steve this is an agregious fake. They're all over the place, and they take in a lot of collectors. The biggest give-away is that the forger couldn't spell 'POSTAGE': have a look at the stamp.

This is what the real stamps look like:



(The fact that these are perforated makes no difference. The same rubber stamp was used for both.)

As these were more often used for revenue than postal purposes, you can also find genuine stamps with the fiscal cancels removed, and faked cancellations similar to that on your item.

Edit to add: The real stamp would be SG 29 (mine are SG 30), and 2012 catalogue value is £90. Actual value: nil, I'm afraid. All the Charkhari collectors have more than enough copies already.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by tonymacg - 01/21/2012 06:46 am
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1927 Posts
Posted 01/21/2012   07:31 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Triggersmob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, Tony.

I hadn't noticed the spelling of postage, but other things just didn't look right to me. That's why I thought I would check. I knew you would have the answers.

Steve
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,686Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.11 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05