Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Nova Scotia Government Sued Over Bluenose II

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,470Next Topic  
Valued Member

392 Posts
Posted 10/05/2012   05:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add lorddenning to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This recent article in the Toronto Star may be of interest to Bluenose fans:

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...se-ii-design
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Canada
652 Posts
Posted 10/05/2012   8:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add canadianphilatelist to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
the province owns the boat so they can do whatever they want with it...this law suit is clearly frivolous.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
1187 Posts
Posted 10/09/2012   08:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Terence Collins to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It isn't frivolous. It isn't about ownership of the boat. It's about the design and the name. Ownership of a vessel does not bestow ownership of the design or the name if these are held in copyright by the designer. Buying a Grand Banks motor yacht does not entitle the owner to copy the design and sell them as such. In this case it seems copyright extends 50 years from the death of the designer and is still valid, and unless sold previously still belongs to the family. Reading the article it is clear that no dollar amount has been mentioned or claimed, and the family are happy for the judge to decide the matter. It could be $5. It could be a lot more. What seems to be at issue here is the use of the name "Bluenose II" on a more than 90% rebuild that might be considered to be a new vessel as so little of the original remains. In all likelihood the only winners in this will be the lawyers.

Terry

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,470Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.11 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05