Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Russia & Area - Help To ID Please!

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 1,614Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   6:41 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add jimjamtwo to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Over Christmas I found time to go through my Russia & Area stamps. There were quite a few I couldn't identify, however. Does anyone know what these are?









Thanks for looking!
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
2361 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   7:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add doug2222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
For starters, two Tannu Tuva earlies, and an unofficial Latvia back of the book (see occupation stamps). The "70" looks like a cutout from Russian postal stationery. Can't read the last item.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   7:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The stamp in the 3rd row is South Russia.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 01/23/2013 7:17 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   7:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the responses.

Doug, you wrote: The "70" looks like a cutout from Russian postal stationery.

I don't think so - I have a whole set of these with different colours and denominations. They are all imperf and heavily toned, but on regular paper.

khj, I've never head of South Russia. Is it listed in Scott?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   7:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, it is the Denikin issue.

In Scott:

South Russia #65(1919)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   7:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I should note Scott has a funny ABC order. South Russia appears after Southern Rhodesia in the Classic catalog; after South Moluccas in the the Vol 6 WW catalog.

Apparently Scott ignores spaces when alphabetizing.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   7:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The stamp in the 4th row is at the back of the Russia listings. I believe it is --

Offices in the Turkish Empire #344(1921).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
296 Posts
Posted 01/23/2013   7:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Art Strohmeier to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
South Russia
In 2006 Scotts, Vol 6 P 77
In 2008 Scotts, Vol 6 P 80
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 01/24/2013   12:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the help, everyone!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Netherlands
333 Posts
Posted 01/24/2013   03:01 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Jan-Simon to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@khj: actually it is quite logical: South Moluccas (and South Georgia and South Kasai for that matter) are not considered classic so they are not in the Classic catalogue. That makes Southern Rhodesia is immediately followed by South Russia, which is how the alphabet wants it.

What I find strange though, is why South Russia has a separate listing and is not bundled with Russia. German states are all under Germany, as the old Italian states are with Italy and Australian states are with Australia. Transvaal, Oranje Vrijstaat, Cape of Good Hope and Natal however are in different volumes (vol.6,vol.4,vol.2 and vol.4 respectively), which is strange given the strategy for Germany, Italy and Australia. The same would apply in my opinion for these Russian issues. I cannot imagine someone collecting South Russia without doing Russia as well, so it makes sense putting these together...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2758 Posts
Posted 01/24/2013   06:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
South Russia was not a country but a philatelic convenience, by grouping several regional government issues in one catalog location. Since these issues were in within modern Ukraine as well as Russia it would be harder to list as a Russian state.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by warrehouse - 01/24/2013 09:44 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 01/24/2013   2:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
@khj: actually it is quite logical: South Moluccas (and South Georgia and South Kasai for that matter) are not considered classic so they are not in the Classic catalogue. That makes Southern Rhodesia is immediately followed by South Russia, which is how the alphabet wants it.

You are correct that it is logical according to the scheme Scott utilizes. Actually, I listed both catalog because I wasn't sure which catalog Jimjamtwo might be using, not that the two catalogs are not consistent. They are consistent according to Scott's alphabetization scheme.

What I meant was that I would have expected all the "South XXXXX" to be listed together, followed by the "Southern XXXXX". In other words, I would have expected South Russia to appear before Southern Rhodesia instead of after, regardless of which catalog.

I don't know how its done elsewhere, but its unusual around my circles to ignore the space when alphabetizing. Most operating systems that I use also do not ignore the space when alphabetizing filenames.

So when I first starting using the Scott catalog, it took some adjustment to get used to finding certain countries/areas that had spaces in their names.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Netherlands
333 Posts
Posted 01/25/2013   03:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Jan-Simon to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There you have a valid point which I did not notice earlier. South(space) should be before Southern in my opinion as well.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 1,614Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05