| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 7,021 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4648 Posts |
|
|
Hi All I have scanned an image of a French naval cruiser used to the end of WW I but I cannot identify the ship. Does any member have an idea what the name of this ship was? I would like to know so that I can properly place it in my album. Thanks a lot Chimo Bujutsu  
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
630 Posts |
|
|
In this case the ship shown on the postcard is clearly pre-dreadnaught era (prior to 1906). The French Battle cruiser Dunkerque was commissioned in 1937. The cruiser in the postcard has a single gun forward turret putting her possibly in the Glorie class. Beyond that I would have to find my Jane's Fighting ships of WWI and I haven't seen it in a few years. Nice postcard! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10600 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1495 Posts |
|
|
I saw my WWI Jane's just yesterday. If somebody doesn't beat me to it, I should be able to post something later tonight.
Robert |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts |
|
|
I am guessing, but it most resembles the Justice, of the Liberté class turret ships. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1495 Posts |
|
|
Here's another view of the vessel in question.  I searched a few references I have and surmise the vessel is a gunboat. The size of the vessel, the one funnel and that spindly mast are giveaways that it is not a major warship like a battleship or cruiser. Jane's Fighting Ships of World War I has silhouettes of two possible candidates, River Gunboats Nos. 1, 2; or River Gunboats Nos. 3, 4. The funnel on the vessel depicted on the card is most like Gunboat Nos. 1, 2. Jane's has no other information on these vessels. The resolution on the page scan is not very good.  An internet search for information on 19th century French river gunboats didn't produce any results, other than some hits on Yangtze river gunboats, which this vessel is not. In any case, that's a really nice card. Robert |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Trainwreck - 06/17/2013 8:27 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
630 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4648 Posts |
|
|
Thanks all for your help.
I thought the "Dunkerque" referred to here was the location, not the ship. It also appears that the publisher of the card was located there as well. This card is also dated 1918 and any information I have seen on the internet has a more modern ship that was commissioned in 1932.
I guess I will have to keep digging.
This is great help from all of you and thanks again.
Chimo
Bujutsu |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
845 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
845 Posts |
|
|
I meant to say "Phlegeton" in the previous post, not "Phelgeton".
"Fletcher, Felcher, whatever" |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4648 Posts |
|
|
lol Hungary - aw geez!
Thanks for the sites. They are quite interesting too. Foreign naval ships are to my area of expertise but when some come across my path, I tend to keep them.
All part of the turf of collecting I guess and that includes the research with some steps forward and sometimes no steps at all <G>
Thanks a lot
Chimo
Bujutsu |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
Here is what Modern Ships of War (Reed and Simpson, 1888) had to say about Cocyte: Quote: The Cocyte and Mitraille belong to a new class, or rather they represent a type which, after disappearing for a season of doubt and denial, has had its value so much recognized that three Continental nations are giving it earnest study. A late French Minister of Marine asked within a year for money to construct fifty of these gun-boats, but was then refused the grant, a decision for which Admiral Sir George Elliot thinks England ought to be very grateful. This distinguished officer believes in the value of the type, and hopes that the Admiralty "will take note of the threat thus made" before the theory is allowed to prevail that adequate security can be given to the British coasts by sea-going cruisers, submarine mines, shore batteries, and torpedo-boats. The boats present a small target, and give good armor protection to guns which, when the vessels are inshore or reinforced by land batteries, have sufficient power to keep battle-ships at a distance. They are very handy, have good speed, and are economical, because for the same money they can, as flotillas, bring into the action four times the gun power possible in the large battle-ships. In France this type is divided into two classes—the Acheron, Cocyte, Phlegeton, and Styx, of 1639 tons, belonging to the first, and the Fusee, Grenade, Mitraille, and Flamme, of 1045 tons, to the second. The iron and steel hulls are extensively subdivided into water-tight compartments, and are protected by complete belts of steel armor at the water-line, and by arched steel-armored decks. The superstructures above the protective decks have water-line belts of cellulose. The armament consists of one heavy gun mounted in a barbette tower, and of a strong secondary battery of machine guns and torpedoes. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4648 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
I wonder if the barbette gun could be fired fully broadside on a boat this small. I'm guessing yes, with only one gun, but I wonder...  Interesting stuff from one little postcard. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
I like the old Mansard roofed house in the background too! Nice old card. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 7,021 |
|