Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Is This Really A Scott GB #65?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,480Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
107 Posts
Posted 07/18/2013   6:41 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add lindseyr702 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I was going along my merry way, assuming that this stamp was a #87 and I decided to check the watermark to be certain and what do you know? The watermark is #25 - spray of roses! Doesn't that make this stamp a #65 or am I missing something? Also - is it missing the perfs on the left side because of plate position or was this poor little thing butchered??



Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
107 Posts
Posted 07/18/2013   6:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add lindseyr702 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Also - the color of this is showing up more "brownish" on my monitor when it's actually much more orange and very close to the Salmon color on the Stanley Gibbons Colour Key!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2361 Posts
Posted 07/18/2013   7:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add doug2222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Assuming a spray of roses, yes, it's a Scott #65. Butchered, unfortunately.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
107 Posts
Posted 07/18/2013   7:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add lindseyr702 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Noooooooooo! That's what I was afraid of!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2361 Posts
Posted 07/18/2013   11:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add doug2222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If you were thinking that the position letters might indicate a wing copy, that's possible for the surface-printed issues, but even wing copies were perforated all around.

Wing copies for this issue (S.G. #151) have the letters D, E, H, or I at lower-right, and Gibbons calls its color "orange-brown".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,480Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05