Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Pod Rules Regarding FDC's

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 2,008Next Topic  
Moderator
1589 Posts
Posted 06/25/2014   09:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add blcjr to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I've been researching the background of US airmail stamps, including the issuance of FDC's. Here is a curious quote from a Postal Bulletin (regarding the issue of Scott C44):


Quote:
Stamp collectors desiring first-day cancellations of this stamp may send a limited number of addressed envelopes, not in excess of 10, to the Postmaster, Seattle Wash., with postal note or money order remittance to cover the cost of the stamps to be affixed. Postage stamps and personal checks will not be accepted in payment. Envelopes submitted should be of ordinary letter size and each must be properly addressed. An enclosure of medium weight should be placed in each envelope and the flap either sealed or turned in. An outside envelope must not be sent for return of first day covers. The envelope to the Postmaster, Seattle, Wash., should be endorsed "First Day Covers."


Given these "rules," how did large quantities of unaddressed FDC's ever come into existence? I could speculate (e.g. that established cachet makers had special arrangements with the POD), but wonder if anyone has more specific knowledge of the matter.

Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 06/25/2014   7:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Your speculation is likely accurate.

Obviously things have changed many times over the years as to how to process first day covers. One also has to remember that back in the day, first day covers had to be sent in advance of their issue date with a remittance for the value of the postage (back in the day, you didn't have any "grace period" to purchase stamps at your post office and send them in for first day cancels).

Many rules we have today concerning first day cover processing have resulted from modernized machinery that now handles the mail, which would result in unwanted postal markings on covers if they were not shrink wrapped in plastic before their return.

Even today, the USPS has special relationships with cachetmakers and dealers as it relates to servicing large volumes of first day covers and how to streamline their processing and return ... and they do get preferential treatment by the USPS, so I understand.

Let's face it: Today's small time collector that wants an example or two of a first day cover is probably better off ordering them from SFS and paying a small premium for that service. When you consider today's postage costs to mail requests to the USPS and then risk getting damaged covers in return, the premium is well worth it.

Cacheted first day covers are another story. I personally feel the unserviced cacheted envelopes are way overpriced today to the point that it would not be financially practical for a small collector to bother to service their own covers, especially when they can find most offered at a significant discount on the secondary market.

Obviously, things have changed over the years and like everything else, the FDC processing "rules" had to change with the times.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 2,008Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.13 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05