| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 3,685 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
379 Posts |
|
|
I have a choice to make, buy it or not, on a Diamond Jubilee 50 cents Unitrade #60. The seller says the stamp was regummed Would that raise the value of the stamp if the stamp was not regummed? Any lesson to get on this topic? 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
305 Posts |
|
|
T me, a regummed stamp should be viewed as an unused stamp. The gum has no meaning since it is fake. It makes the stamp MNG. Dont think it affects the value in any way. You could juste soak it to remove the fake gum...... |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Coriandre - 12/24/2014 03:52 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1614 Posts |
|
|
regummed stamps could be hiding thins or other faults. I usually just soak them back to the no gum state |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
715 Posts |
|
|
This is an area I admit I have no clue about. Is the reason Mike mentioned - to hide flaws - the main reason a stamp would be regummed? Are there other reasons? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1614 Posts |
|
|
I don't think it's the main reason. From the many I've come across in various collections I've picked up, only one or 2 had thins. I think it's more so just to fool a novice into thinking it's MNH.
Haven't soaked many that the regum didn't just float right off although a couple needed to be rubbed with my fingers under water to remove all traces of it - was gooey until rubbed.
They really don't bother me since I prefer looking at the front of the stamp than the back and once they are in my album, I'll probably never see the back again :) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
379 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Re gumming to me is changing the original state of a stamp..If you guys say it dosen't matter, it dosen't change the value, look at it this way..If I changed the perforation of a stamp which is what a re gummer is doing (changing the original state) to me the stamp is ruined..Does that make any sense...? Robert |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
644 Posts |
|
|
Not sure how the stamp is ruined since (as mentioned) you can just soak off the gum. This would bring it back to it's no gum state (ie. before anyone tried to re-gum it).
Perforations can't be undone. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
763 Posts |
|
|
Regummed stamps are generally considered to be about the same market value as a no-gum stamp. I prefer no gum, as do many collectors because regummed stamps very often are hiding faults which sometimes can't be detected through the fake gum. Regumming is probably the most common alteration expert services see, then reperfing, then removed cancels. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts |
|
|
It is probably better to have the stamp with no gum rather than regummed. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Regumming is probably the most common alteration expert services see, then reperfing, then removed cancels.
Bill, answer me this,,,Is this not sort of illegal as most people who use these services are doing so to alter a stamp, for personal pleasure, but more likely for profit..??? Could these services (if they are honest) post names, stamp and what they have done as so people like us can investigate potential forgeries..?? Robert |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
517 Posts |
|
|
I don't think in this situation it would be a fake. I think it's more of an alteration of preservation kinda like giving it a dirt bath or hinge removal and not a fake if this makes sense I mean I'm a Newby. Let's just say I have a mint classic stamp or any mint stamp for this reason and I tore the stamp and had the tear repaired because I didn't want further damage to the stamp. Now, did I just do an alteration for preservation or did I just create a fake. A fine line perhaps by definition? I think regumming and telling about it doesn't make it a fake stamp. The seller is disclosing the fact and not trying to fool anyone. Should be the price of NG and hope nothing else, but if you reperf or cut off perfs, print copies and trying to make something look like something else alone this line then yes fake(counterfeit, imitating, knockoff). That's my take Dana |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Is the 'intent' of the hobbyist really the determining factor? I certainly can see how the 'intent' is important, but it is an intangible that fades with memory and time. I look at this subject the same way I view part numbers and stamp catalog numbers; 'fit, form, function'. If the 'fit, form, or function' is different than the stamp is different in my mind. Of course there are tolerances which apply and it has always bothered me that we don't really have those tolerances to compare against. (A good example is rotary vs. flat plate design dimensions.)
But when a hobbyist changes the condition of a stamp, it certainly changes the stamp itself. (For better or for worse.) While this does not change a catalog number, it certainly can change the value. This is where 'intent' may come into play; the trouble is how does the 'intent' follow the stamp? If the collection is well documented, changes in the stamp conditions are well noted and value is most likely added. But if the alternation(s) are not documented, or condition is altered without disclosure, in general value is deceased.
But while our 'intent' may be noble or simply a personal preference today; our collections ultimately will be in the hands of other folks down the road. It is our responsibility to be good stewards and we should do everything we can to document our stamps and their history for future generations of collectors. Don
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Merry Christmas to you Robert, hope that you and yours enjoy good health and many exciting new 'finds' this upcoming year! Don |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 3,685 |
|