Hi, I started going through a medium-sized accumulation of Belgian stamps I've had around for a while. I have a question about some of the 1940s and 1950s definitives.
First, here's King Baudouin on Scott 452, possibly one of the world's least unusual stamps:

Second, here's an equally unexotic sample from the 1951 Lion of Belgium series:

Why such a wide variation? Besides the striking color changes in the Baudouin issues in particular, they can also be anywhere from reasonably sharp to quite blurry - to the point where the King's facial expression seems to change from one stamp to the next. Did they use lousy ink? Did what they thought was good ink fade over time? Why are some of them so blurry? Was the printing company a hive of antimonarchists?
I'm curious, because quite a few Belgian stamps look to be of high quality all around; why are these definitives so...well, shoddy?