Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

US Postage Due Variety (?)

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,658Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 05/07/2017   12:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Partime to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
A member of our club obtained a very large amount of cancelled, almost complete sheets of Scott J99 and J100. So, I spent some time browsing to find something of interest. Scott value for these items as used, is very low, so I wasn't looking very hard.

For the $1.00, J100, it was easy to see that there were two distinct overprint styles ... a thick, heavy print, and a lighter overprint.

For the heavy style, I picked out a subtle difference and looked through the rest of his examples. This seemed to only occur in one position, and I grabbed two examples (leaving another, heavily cancelled item, for the other bottom feeders.)





The second specimen has the same broken top feature:



I searched and searched, but could not find this same issue with the lighter overprint variety. However, I found at least two examples of a different style of the broken top, shown in the right-hand stamp below:



Are these known varieties? Any value?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
810 Posts
Posted 05/11/2017   3:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add postagedueguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The denominations were printed on the postage due sheets using rubber plates with the denominations in the same way regular issue stamps were precanceled with city names.

As the rubber plates were used they wore out and some of the letters cracked or broke off. So broken letters are not that uncommon. On this J100 sheet position 90 the letter 'D' is missing. So it reads '1 OLLAR'.

Position 46 the 'R' is broken too and 'D' broken in positions 85, 94 & 95.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by postagedueguy - 05/11/2017 3:56 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 05/13/2017   01:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Any idea why there is a thick and thin version of the overprint? It is pretty obvious when put side-by-side.

I'll have to look again for that missing D variety. Thanks for the info.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
810 Posts
Posted 05/13/2017   4:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add postagedueguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Any idea why there is a thick and thin version of the overprint? It is pretty obvious when put side-by-side.

Since the overprinting plates were made of rubber it depended on the amount of pressure applied on the plates during the printing process. Also, it could just be just different rubber plates made over the years with bad or indifferent quality control.

I'll have to look again for that missing D variety.




It's on the ninth row all the way to the right.



J91 triple overprint - I actually bought this at the post office.


J92 double overprint


J97 double overprint - fake, but it looks really neat!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by postagedueguy - 05/13/2017 4:12 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,658Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05