Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Can Anyone Help Me Figure Out What Scott Number These Are Please?

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,354Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   3:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add collect4daze to your friends list Get a Link to this Message

Thank you for your help in advanced.




Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
211 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   3:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ggreve to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is a 3¢ Washington of 1861-1868, but that does not narrow it down much. We will need to determine the color. I am not a color guy, but it looks pink to me. It is probably as Scott 64 or 65.

Can you tell if there any grill marks? If so, they would be the 1967 or 1968 variety and a Scott between 79 and 94.

I am sure others will help you further.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by ggreve - 10/24/2017 3:47 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1812 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   3:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They both appear to be Scott #65 (no grill points are visible, and they can usually be easily seen on canceled copies of this stamp).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   4:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add collect4daze to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here is a larger image...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
51 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   4:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add collect4daze to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
No grill marks on the pink stamp. The one on the envelope does not have one. They are both genuine. I do not know the scott for the one on the mail piece.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1273 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   7:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Date appears to be Dec. 6, 1865; if correct, cover stamp would most likely be #65. Both stamps look to be somewhat faded in color.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   7:26 pm  Show Profile Check sinclair2010's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add sinclair2010 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I actually like the one with the target cancel. The stamp could just be a pale shade rather than a faded stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
540 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   9:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rhett to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Note that the one with the target cancel is not tied to the cover by the cancel.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1355 Posts
Posted 10/24/2017   11:52 pm  Show Profile Check ray.mac's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add ray.mac to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Actually many of the '65 shades are lighter, or duller. Here are the shades identified as being printed in '65:

BRIGHT ROSE RED Early 1865
Pale rose red Early 1865
DULL RED Early 1865
Rose brown Early 1865
Pale rose brown Mid 1865
BROWN RED Mid 1865
PALE BROWN RED Late 1865

The rose brown shade is not a bright or bold shade, so it leaves only bright rose red and brown red as bright possibilities.

I would think that although the '65 cover doesn't have a stamp that is tied, it looks like the type of shade you'd see in '65-'66. '64 was a year of very bright shades with a lot of lake mixed in, and then until the grill shades came around, most of the shades were warmer, duller and lighter.

Either way, since it's dated '65, it can only be #65. All of the pinks were printed in August of '61, and they just didn't stick around the post offices or in someone's home until '65.

Here is my "Pale brown red", one of the '65's, and you'll see how it's also a pale, but not faded shade, ID'd by Mike McClung:



Your '65 doesn't come close to any of the other dull/pale '65 shades:

Pale rose brown:


Pale red rose:


Dull red:


So, by process of elimination, your '65 on cover could be pale brown red, but it really can't be done on email, since all screens are different (Ask Don about that one!).

The other stamp, it looks like it's just a faded stamp-- a lot of the faded ones look pink or pinkish, but without a date stamp showing '61 or early '62, you won't be able to get a cert saying it's pink anything.

Hope this is all helpful,
Ray
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1273 Posts
Posted 10/25/2017   5:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Ray Check these and see what you think:

This on is docketed as 9/23/65


This one has carrier CDS of 7/25/66. The ink on the envelope is pretty faded.


No year date, but I'm thinking might be pale brown red?


No year date here (1861 would have been nice) and Its really faded (to me)?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1355 Posts
Posted 10/26/2017   01:02 am  Show Profile Check ray.mac's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add ray.mac to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well, Mr. Gator, you can come over anytime, and I've got a pretty good reference collection of the shades from a pretty good source!!

Ray
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
674 Posts
Posted 10/26/2017   09:40 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mdroth to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
As long as all the 3c experts are in the area, I'd be very happy to hear some opinions of this one! Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated!








Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1273 Posts
Posted 10/26/2017   09:58 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ray, I wish you didn't live half way to the moon. Next meeting we'll work on setting a date to get together for a Saturday on a cold winter's day.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1273 Posts
Posted 10/26/2017   10:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Mdroth, It appears to be a grilled issue which puts the use in 1868 or later. Color isn't the typical color of most #94s so its possibly a #88 or?? Can you count the grill points in the rows and columns?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
674 Posts
Posted 10/26/2017   11:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mdroth to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Mr. Gator -

I certainly tried that - to a ridiculously absurd extent - when I first got this cover. (Prob 8-9 yrs ago?) Haven't looked at it in years - just found the pictures today & saw this thread at the same time. If I thought I could do it any better now, with any certainty, I'd give it a try, but I doubt it would be useful. Stamp is obviously on cover, and I've got no desire to remove it...

Any way to tell for sure without removing it?? Next time I fire up the scanner, maybe a better scan - assuming it is better than the one from old times?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
540 Posts
Posted 10/26/2017   12:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rhett to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
mdroth, to each his own, but I would have no inhibitions whatsoever about removing that stamp from the cover to aid in identifying it. The stamp is not tied to that cover by the cancel.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,354Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05