Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Lets Not Forget Squared Circle Cancels.

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 3,230Next Topic  
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 11/10/2017   09:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wert to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
On an earlier poll taken a while ago, a lot of collectors posted the only collect mint stamps...How boring that would be if every one of us all collected mint stamps only..EVERY ONES collection would be exactly the same, if you know what I mean.

I am having trouble with my scanner, so please be patient.

Here are a couple of my squared circle cancels.

My oldest is the Scott 41 below.

LOCATION: Kingston, Ontario
CANCEL DATE: June 12th, 1894 (my oldest so far, still going through stamps)
HAMMER: Type 2
CLERK #:3



Here is one more...

LOCATION: Belleville, Ontario
CANCEL DATE:Jan, 17th, 1899
HAMMER: Type 3
CLERK #: 2



DOES ANY ONE HAVE OLDER SQUARED CIRCLE CANCELS.
Send note to Staff
Edited by wert - 11/10/2017 09:44 am

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2779 Posts
Posted 11/10/2017   10:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Battlestamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here's one from Tilsonburg, Ontario on cover -




and another from Brantford, Ontario on a postal card -


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Battlestamps - 11/10/2017 10:10 am
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 11/10/2017   10:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Battlestamps...Nice strike.
Does not have clerk # as shown in the blue circle..Some have it and some do not...Tilsonburg was one that did not.



PROOFED:Oct. 16th, 1893
EARLIEST:Oct. 19th, 1893
LATEST:(A.M.) June. 7th,1900

Post master at the time was E.D.Tillson

Keep our eye open, cause some squared circles for Tilsonburg were printed with an error..Some had a double "L"

Robert

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1449 Posts
Posted 11/10/2017   2:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Renden to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
wert
here are a few covers - woud appreciate your comments on the cancels-my only reference is Unitrade 2018 pp 650-651-652




Am pretty sure the 3rd cancel is not a square circle postmark - dated 1878....

Rene
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Renden - 11/10/2017 2:19 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Norway
1661 Posts
Posted 11/11/2017   06:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Blaamand to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Another interesting thread - thanks for starting it Robert!

Quote:
How boring that would be if every one of us all collected mint stamps only.
I agree! I simply love postmarks - a clean mint stamp collection without any postmarks whatsoever - no sign of the postal service stamps were supposed to do, no evidence of where or when a stamp was used....well, then one could maybe just as well collect stickers ....


I was not aware that the digit on top of the squared circles represent the clerk # - cool!


Rene - lovely covers! Afraid neither of them are squared circles, but guess you know that already (?) The first has a numeral cancel in duplex (duplex with CDS on a single hammer), 2nd has a mute 9-bar cancel in duplex and the last has a lovely 'fancy' cancel and CDS.
btw - quite a peculiar shade on the 3c small queen on your first cover - seems to have oxidized into a purple shade! (at least on my monitor)

Keep them coming

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Blaamand - 11/11/2017 06:55 am
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1449 Posts
Posted 11/11/2017   10:09 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Renden to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I knew they were not square circles postmarks (ref: Unitrade and the Web) but I wanted a knowledgeable member to confirm and just discuss the cancels and Thanks !

Funny colour (color)on the 3cent cover, indeed.

And I had no intention of hijacking wert's thread - sorry wert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Renden - 11/11/2017 12:21 pm
Pillar Of The Community
6332 Posts
Posted 11/11/2017   10:32 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would respectfully question (and seek proof of) the statement that the extra internal number is a "clerk number". It is far more likely to be a "device number" and a way to differentiate several similar devices in an office - and to quickly identify among the handstamps when an errant date or time needs changing, etc. It seems illogical that an office with multiple employees would give a canceling monopoly to 1 or 2 clerks.

This "device numbering" method would also be consistent with numbering dials or killers of machine cancels in offices with multiple machines.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 11/11/2017 10:38 am
Pillar Of The Community
603 Posts
Posted 11/11/2017   2:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add archerg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That internal "number" is usually referred to as a time mark, it is not always a number either, you can find AM, PM, NT (no time) etc. That inaccuracy was bugging me for a few days, but I am by no means an expert on the squared circle, and hoped someone else would post and confirm.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 11/13/2017   12:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I would respectfully question (and seek proof of) the statement that the extra internal number is a "clerk number"


The true identity is called "time marks" or "direction marks"...I apologize for misleading you as per "clerk mark"...But is was changed as per needed (by a clerk) especially for cover direction as to final destination.

Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 3,230Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05