| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,587 |
|
|
Valued Member
12 Posts |
|
|
Hello everyone, I'll start with saying that I am just now rediscovering stamp collecting, so feel free to laugh at me for this question. I have a US Special delivery stamp which I keep measuring and it keeps coming up 11 1/4 perf. But I can find no such thing online :) So help please, do these exist or am I measuring wrong? I'm using a Showgard gauge so at least I'm sure that the gauge is correct. Here's an image, sorry about the fuzziness but the perfs are visible. I could scan it tomorrow if needed.  Thank you Edit: Sides are 10.5 perf
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by NewToThis - 11/26/2017 07:17 am |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
674 Posts |
|
|
E13 is perf 11. E16 is 11x10 1/2...
If the sides are 10 1/2, then its E16... |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
12 Posts |
|
|
Yes, I go that far :)
So no 11 1/4 variations in existence? Because it's definitely not matching the 11 as far as I can see |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
674 Posts |
|
|
According to the Scott US Specialized, no...
But perf variations exist. Measuring perfs - esp within quarters - requires a serious tool & lots of expertise/practice.
Not familiar with the showgard tool you're using, but I'm skeptical. If you want to measure perfs to within a 1/4 , you'll need a much more sophisticated perf gauge...
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
12 Posts |
|
|
Quote: requires a serious tool & lots of expertise/practice. Both of which I don't have  Thank you for the help though |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
12 Posts |
|
|
I tried that too. I have a twenty cent special delivery which does match the 11 perf on my gauge. When I align the first holes, the last ones actually do become misaligned but I trust that even less than my gauge. Edit: My other beginner method was to measure and count :) The 20 cent stamp has 21 holes in exactly 3.7 cm. The 15 cent one measures a bit more than 3.6 cm for the same 21 holes. But again, the differences are too small to be sure  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by NewToThis - 11/26/2017 08:41 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts |
|
|
According to the U.S. Kiusalas Specialist Gauge, the Stickney rotary press 11 x 10.5 perforations in Scott are more like Kiusalas 11-70=11.25 by Kiusalas 10.5-75=10.50 Thus, it is actually more accurately 11.25 x 10.50 in quarter perfs instead of only half perfs. (For U.S. flat plate stamps, it is Kiusalas 11-72=10.94 by Kiusalas 11-72=10.94 which is stated as 11 x 11 in the Scott Catalogue. Thus, the perf 11 for rotary (11.25) and flat (10.94) plates is actually different by over a quarter perf.)
Unfortunately Scott has not made such changes in gauge listings when it is warranted. For Canadian stamps in Scott/Unitrade such a quarter difference should be noted for Stickney rotary press Canadian stamps 11.25 x 11 verses flat plate press 11 x 11 stamps, both are still listed as 11 x 11 in their stamp catalogues. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jogil - 11/26/2017 09:37 am |
|
|
Valued Member
12 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Thus, it is actually more accurately 11.25 x 10.50 in quarter perfs instead of only half perfs. Aha! There's that mystery solved! I should change my username to EagleEye   Thank you jogil |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts |
|
|
 NewToThis: You should be congratulated on making such an eagle eye observation that has been overlooked by the stamp cats (catalogues). Eagles 1, Cats 0 |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jogil - 11/26/2017 09:12 am |
|
|
Valued Member
12 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Eagles 1, Cats 0 Good one!  But it's actually more like Eagles 0, Cats 1. I was starting to believe that I had stumbled onto an unknown variation  I wonder why they don't update them, though. Such an obvious misrepresentation... Or is it that Scott doesn't list quarters at all? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts |
|
|
But since it's the cat's fault, you still get the point.
They appear to list perforation gaugings to the closest halves and not to the closest quarters for old line perforated stamps. For more modern stamps, they list perforation gaugings to the closest decimals (tenths). |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jogil - 11/26/2017 09:44 am |
|
|
Moderator

United States
12330 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
12 Posts |
|
|
Quote: They appear to list perforation gaugings to the closest halves and not to the closest quarters for old line perforated stamps. For more modern stamps, they list perforation gaugings to the closest decimals (tenths). Good to know. Although it's probably impossible to tell differences in tenths with just the naked eye. Thank you all for your help. I'm going to like it here  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4087 Posts |
|
|
Quote: For more modern stamps, they list perforation gaugings to the closest decimals (tenths). Some. not all |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,587 |
|