Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Decimal Varieties And Errors

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 80 / Views: 9,821Next Topic
Page: of 6
Valued Member
Australia
127 Posts
Posted 05/18/2018   02:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add castor to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
1974 $2 'Red Gums of Far North'

I have just spent time going through my examples of this stamp. Brusden White list 4 varieties in used condition and until I found a "fungus" flaw (BW 665e) I really had no idea what I was looking for as the the images and description did not really help. Had I read the attached note (6) I would have read that there is also a red dot in the sky on both stage I and II of this flaw. Once this was known I found a stage I, the stage II is very obvious.

BW 665d blue dot on hill at left



BW 665f large green dot between trees
(note: it's more a line than a dot, and also appears as a 'v')




The above two varieties note colour while BW 665e does not.

BW 665e "fungus" flaw on large tree at right
(the fungus is not noticable in the b/w images provided and will cause great frustration but once you spot a stage II you know all! I'm not great in description of colour but I would say bright neon blue (aqua). And once I realised the red dot (note 6.) I found a stage I, though I'm still not sure because the red dot has moved slightly right, which is not consistent BUT it does have small neon colour as per stage II. Maybe a very early stage I ???)
The scans do no justice to the colour.

BW 665e stage I



DW665e stage II



Has anyone else a stage I we can compare with?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2027 Posts
Posted 06/17/2018   03:47 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jubilee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here's one from the ever-popular (and now "Dead") Norfolk Island.

The DIFMEN's for DIEMEN's variety, R8/5, SG101a, in a positional plate block




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1692 Posts
Posted 06/17/2018   5:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rob041256 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Jubilee

That's quite an interesting variety.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
127 Posts
Posted 06/19/2018   10:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add castor to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Very nice variety Jubilee
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
127 Posts
Posted 07/11/2018   7:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add castor to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
1979 Fishing in Australia 50c Deep Sea

I previously posted this block of four on page 3 of this thread as it showed the two left stamps with a vertical strip of (violet) missing from the background mountain, left of the fishing line. This doesn't appear in any catalogue I've seen.

However, on revisiting this stamp I notice that the top left stamp (one of the 2 with the missing colour) has the ACSC 855d Red flaw over "5" of "50".

Does anyone have this flaw and could check to see if their stamp also has the missing violet. With what I have all I can say is at least two stamps in column have the missing violet.
Appreciate any input on this.

Block of four - top left is ACSC 855d

855d enlargement

normal stamp enlarged
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by castor - 07/11/2018 7:53 pm
Page: of 6 Previous TopicReplies: 80 / Views: 9,821Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05