| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,735 |
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
230 Posts |
|
|
Hello everyone, Hereby two stamps where I cannot find the right catalog number. I think it is SG 105 or SG 118... Can you guys determine which catalog number the right one is. Thank you very much!  
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
328 Posts |
|
|
We must be looking at different Gibbons Catalogues.
My version which is the 2013 Commonwealth & British Empire Stamps 1840 - 1940 edition shows that they are either SG 351-356 or SG 418 for the 1/2d value, and SG 362-365 or SG 420 for the 1-1/2d value.
The defining issue is the watermark - it will be either the Royal Cypher which has a crown with GvR in script above it, or repeating block letters of GvR with a small crown above it. (See the catalogue to view the watermarks).
Once you determine the watermark, you will have to decide on the color. It is kind of tough with used stamps, but if it is the script watermark, I would guess the 1/2d is SG 351 (1/2d Green) and the 1-1/2d is SG 362 (1-1/2d Red-Brown).
Let us know if you determine the watermark. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
437 Posts |
|
|
Actually 105 and 118 are the illustration numbers, not the catalogue numbers. Your stamps are both 105, the most obvious difference being the vignette - the area behind the head which is shaded like your two examples and solid for illustration 118.
KGVIStamps has already given you the correct possible SG numbers - they are all illustration 105. Clive
|
Send note to Staff
|
AlbumEasy - Free software for creating custom stamp album pages ChromaMate - Compare, match, analyse, free colour matching software ImageSleuth - Images, hidden inside images, revealed. A retroReveal alternative PSGSA - The Philatelic Society for Greater Southern Africa |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
328 Posts |
|
|
Clive, thanks for figuring it out. I couldn't see how he got SG 105. It never occurred to me to look at the illustration number. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
230 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
Ricky, sometimes holding the stamp in a strong light works, but you can usually use a black tray and some lighter fluid will work.
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
328 Posts |
|
|
I use black paper under a strong light. The watermarks are very different, so even if you just see a few letters you can tell them apart. Script characters are the Royal Cypher, and Block characters are the one used later on. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
507 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
230 Posts |
|
|
The first stamp is watermarked with GvR and a crown, so that must be a SG no. 418. I now know that the catalog numbers are stated in the most left column of the text. Thanks for the correction. Now the one who is perforated, I cannot discover any watermark under bright light... Maybe other tricks for getting the best view of the watermark?
Greetings from Holland |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
230 Posts |
|
|
Quote: The first stamp is watermarked with GvR and a crown, so that must be a SG no. 418. I now know that the catalog numbers are stated in the most left column of the text. Thanks for the correction. Now the one who is perforated, I cannot discover any watermark under bright light... Maybe other tricks for getting the best view of the watermark?
Greetings from Holland Somebody who can confirm my findings? Sincerely Yours, Ricky93 |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Now the one who is perforated, I cannot discover any watermark under bright light... Maybe other tricks for getting the best view of the watermark? If everything else fails (ie you do not purchase Watermark fluid) then soaking in cold water always does the trick. Cold water, immerse stamp for say 10 minutes, and place on a darkish dish, the Wmk will stand out clearly. Takes 1-3 days to dry the stamp in a drying sandwich. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,735 |
|