Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

US Scott 769 And 770 With Extra Large Selvedge

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 925Next Topic  
Valued Member
262 Posts
Posted 10/03/2018   7:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add bobplates to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
A bit confused by these 2 items. Were the sheets of 6 souvenir sheets produced with such a wide selvedge? Or is this something else?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob


Send note to Staff

Rest in Peace
United States
1189 Posts
Posted 10/03/2018   8:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stampman2002 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
These are the 1935 Special Printing (Farley Reprints). That is the only way to get these with the marginal selvage still attached.

The top one would be Scott 770 while the bottom one is Scott 769.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Stampman2002 - 10/03/2018 8:55 pm
Pillar Of The Community
6341 Posts
Posted 10/03/2018   8:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Perfectly normal. From Scott: "Issues in sheets of 20 panes of 6 each." Yes, they have a super-wide margin around the outer edge of the press-sheet. Your examples were cut from a press sheet by a collector - that's also how all the various gutter and cross-gutter items were made.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
225 Posts
Posted 10/03/2018   9:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add MeadowviewCollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

While I am a relative newbie I do recall a member named Stampman2002 started a thread on the 1934 Farley issues and the 1935 reprints in this thread https://goscf.com/t/54752

On page 4 the two in question are pictured.

-MV
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/03/2018   9:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Gibbons, London, Condemns Farley Issue

Terming the issue "waste-paper." Stanley Gibbons
of London, decree that the Farley imperforates
will not be listed in their catalog, just as the
Colonial Dominions are announcing the Silver
Jubilee outfit of 176 varieties with a combined
face value of well over $15 per set. "The stamps
(Farley's) have not been generally issued
throughout the United States, and have therefore
no standing or interest for stamp collectors,"
the Editor reports. Last word from the Philatelic
Agency was that sales were rapidly approaching the
million dollar mark.

- George B. Sloane
Sloane's Column
Stamps
May 4, 1935


Note: Gibbons did modify its stand subsequently
and the Farleys are listed in my antique 1966
copy of SG. I suspect that the Farleys survived
because, as usual, most collectors follow their
own whims and the stamps are very attractive.
The reprinting of the stamps was a tribute to
the power of collector protests.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 925Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05