Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Two Varieties Of 1861 Victoria Stamp?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,130Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
69 Posts
Posted 10/18/2018   2:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add restoman to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
These two stamps are both Scott # 71, the 6p gray black. Both are on paper with the single-lined figure watermark. There are many differences between the two stamps. The right stamp has incomplete edges on the vignette, the outer frame line is of widely varying thickness, and the line at the end of the queen's mouth extends both above and below the lips. Is this just a printing variation, a plate variety or a forgery?
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
12561 Posts
Posted 10/18/2018   2:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts
Posted 10/18/2018   4:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Note in the fakes given there, the hair bun/chignon are different.
Also see: https://www.stampsofvictoria.com/beaded.php - scroll down
Note that the head medallion was changed to a smaller size and also wore badly as time went on. So I think that's what's up with the stamp on the right.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
69 Posts
Posted 10/18/2018   6:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add restoman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you to both of you for some very helpful and detailed information in those links. It would seem that both stamps are genuine, as the forgeries would not be on the proper watermarked paper, and that the differences can be accounted for by the way the adaptations were made to the plate. The link provided by hy-brasil was particularly useful as it showed how much variation can be found on the plate in the later printings. Thanks again!!!
~Glenn
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
975 Posts
Posted 10/20/2018   8:11 pm  Show Profile Check 64idgaf's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 64idgaf to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Restoman,

This design was an adaptation of the 6d 'Beaded Oval' design. There are two dies and you have one of each here. The first stamp shown by you is die II, with the central vignette fully occupying the oval space, the stamp on the right is die I where there is a larger white band around the vignette containing the Queen's head.

JG
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/20/2018   10:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
JG
Where may I get advice on the two dies please?

I have been studying my Gibbons,
If the 6d both have the single line "6" wmk, then (apparently) the corrollory suggests that the Paper is both De La Rue.
Gibbons does not offer advice on a change of dies for this issue (In my catalogue)

Aha..second reading I see Saunders and DLR exist in the two dies (a&b)
"1862 central vignette cut from Type 9 with a new frame"

SG #107 (18th June 1863) Perf 12 or Perf 13 (jet black or grey black)

The DLR paper is more brittle and whiter than the TH Saunders.

I'd like to clarify what to me looks uncertain at the moment.

Thanks
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 10/20/2018 10:07 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
975 Posts
Posted 10/21/2018   01:16 am  Show Profile Check 64idgaf's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 64idgaf to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod,

I was using Kellow's 'Stamps of Victoria'.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 10/21/2018   07:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you JG.

Perhaps Glenn, or other's interested, care to see the variance on my triplet.
Frame varies considerably.
I make no apologies for condition.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
4031 Posts
Posted 10/22/2018   5:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KGV Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nice post!

Always like looking for the differences but this time it is x 3 stamps.

Oh how the old printing styles charm the collector!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,130Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.15 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05