After 150+ years, one should expect gum and oral bacteria to produce a good growth of mold even in the best of atmospheric conditions. Too bad this one was left on piece.
Hi Phil_Atelic (clever name btw), Yes, it is an 11A so is correctly identified. Regarding removed cancel, this is best seen under UV light. There are traces of toning, but I don't believe they are elements of a removed cancel. I'd have to have it in hand to be able to tell any more about it. If you have a good strong UV (Either 254nm UV-A or a 10BL-B UV-B) it would help to determine if there has been any removed cancel. By my overall thought at this moment is, it has not been.
I would agree with everything ClassicPhilatelist says. If I HAD to guess whether this is uncancelled or removed-cancel, I would guess uncancelled. It APPEARS to be on a classic-era piece, and a cancel-remover would probably have removed it from the piece to begin with to do his/her work. It APPEARS to be unaltered, but you should still look at it under a UV lamp. BTW, it was not unheard of to have an envelope go through the mails and have the cancel miss the stamp, or be uncancelled.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here