Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Scott 63, German States

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 1,758Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 03/30/2019   11:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Stamps4Life to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
So I was having trouble finding this in my album. I was expecting it to be in with Germany, Scott International Album Part II, but found it in Part I under Bavaria..... Anyhow, Scott catalogue says it should be 14 1/2 perf and Im getting 14 x 14 1/2. Do I have the wrong ID or measuring wrong? Thoughts please. Tks. much. I do also see the Wmk 95h.





Send note to Staff
Edited by Stamps4Life - 03/31/2019 12:34 pm

Pillar Of The Community
France
2926 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   12:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add vayolene to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Your stamp in Michel catalog : #56
Year : 1888
Perf 14 1/2
Watermark 4 (narrow horizontal wavy lines)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by vayolene - 03/31/2019 12:43 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   05:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Realize the numbers in catalogs are often rounded to the nearest half. Measuring a few used that I have, the top perfs and bottoms measure 14.25, the sides measure 14.5. So there's the difference. Some of the top perf holes on this one look deepened to obscure short perfs; that could throw off perf gauge measurement. It's not an expensive stamp, I know, but it still appears to be "improved".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
432 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   08:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hornet785 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi,

Under Michel and more under Peter Sem,

These were issued in 1888, 1900 and 1920. Two type of papers and two type of perforations and for the extremist, two colors on the Bx.

Comb perfs 14

Perf A and B, A: small holes, B: normal like this one

Paper x, 1888, y, 1900 and y, 1920.

In this case it is a Mi.Nr.56Bx

Here one of my cover having two Nr.56By

Best regards

Hornet


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by hornet785 - 03/31/2019 08:28 am
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   12:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps4Life to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Hi,

Under Michel and more under Peter Sem,

These were issued in 1888, 1900 and 1920. Two type of papers and two type of perforations and for the extremist, two colors on the Bx.

Comb perfs 14

Perf A and B, A: small holes, B: normal like this one

Paper x, 1888, y, 1900 and y, 1920.

In this case it is a Mi.Nr.56Bx

Here one of my cover having two Nr.56By

Best regards

Hornet


Tks. Im using a Scott catalogue, 2019. I dont see this stamp under or after 1920, regular postage???? I still think its a Scott 63 with the perf's being a little off. I didnt realize the perf. no.'s were rounded in the catalogue's.

I dont have a Mitchell catalogue or conversion to Mitchell. Is 56 Mitchell the same as Scott 63?

What do you mean by Bx ?

Tks again
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   12:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps4Life to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Realize the numbers in catalogs are often rounded to the nearest half. Measuring a few used that I have, the top perfs and bottoms measure 14.25, the sides measure 14.5. So there's the difference. Some of the top perf holes on this one look deepened to obscure short perfs; that could throw off perf gauge measurement. It's not an expensive stamp, I know, but it still appears to be "improved".


Tks much. Interesting on the rounding. I never knew that. Another variable to consider now.

What do you mean by "improved" ? Faked / forged? Or better than ordinary condition?

tks again.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   12:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps4Life to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
thanks vayolene - guessing that converts to Scott 63? Sorry, I had the wrong no. in the title(65).....
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Stamps4Life - 03/31/2019 12:53 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   1:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps4Life to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ok, so now I feel like a...., well, never mind. What I have been trying to do is identify duplicates for stamps I am sorting and comparing to albums that I got which were my father's. What I could not figure out 1st of all was why Bavaria was not listed in the Germany section. Answered that one. Then when I got to the Bavaria album, I did not see the stamp here in question in the appropriate dating. I saw some on the 1st picture above, but wondered why they would not have been listed in regular pages with dates. I also saw some listed on the regular dated pages, but saw no date. Just now, the light bulb went off and I discovered the dates were covered by an inserted duplicate stamp - see picture 2. So Im still guessing its a Scott 63. Another lesson learned - look under duplicates covering dates





Haven't verified yet, but the ones on the blank page look to be different perfs than the dated page. Investigating.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
432 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   1:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hornet785 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi,

Yes, Nr.63 under Scott.

Yours is on tone paper (Which you don't see under Scott)

So under Michel and Peter Sem Cat, yours is a Nr.56Bx

B = Normal holes

x = Tone paper before 1900. y = White paper, issued 1900 to 1911.

The Scott 62, 63, 72 have been re-used in 1920.

Salutation

Hornet

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   2:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps4Life to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Hornet - there's a lot to this!!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
432 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   2:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hornet785 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi,

Ok, first, the design was used from 1876 to 1911 (Forget the old currency KREUZER from 1867-1875)

So without Cat number and using Scott Watermark number:

1876-1881

1876 Perf 11 1/2 Watermark 95 (3 Pf, 5 green, 10, 20, 25, 50)

1878 Perf 11 1/2 Watermark 95 (5 Pf violet, 50)

1881 Perf 11 1/2 Watermark 95v (3 Pf, 5 violet, 10, 20, 25, 50)

1888-1900

1888 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95h (3 Pf, 5 violet, 10, 20, 25, 50)

1890 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95h (3 Pf brown, 5 green, 25, 50)

1900 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95h (2 Pf grey, 30, 40, 80)

1911 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95v (5 Pf green)

Mark value stamps it is another story.

So with that you can have fun sorting your stamps. They can not be mixed once you know Perf and Watermark.

Here a link in german more specialized

https://pfgzeit.hpage.de/wappen-37-75.html

Nice stamps there!

Best regards

Hornet







Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
432 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   2:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hornet785 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Stamps4Life,

Your 6 KREUZER Brown with the two circle postmark is a very good keeper!!! I think I see NÜRNBERG in 1856? It's not the town but
the type of postmark. A good 50.00$ +++

Here one of mine

Hornet

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by hornet785 - 03/31/2019 5:37 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   5:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps4Life to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Hornet - tks for all the info AND the link. A lot there. Here is another pic I took. Doesnt look quite as good as in real life but im sure theres a natural order in either taking the pic then cropping or vice versa then enlarging, etc... Sometimes I get better ones than other times.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
432 Posts
Posted 03/31/2019   7:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hornet785 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi,

Nice, looks like a plate 3, 4 corners sharp. Beside the ink smear from cancellation, it's a good one.

The 3 KREUZER blue is another sport.

Hornet
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
432 Posts
Posted 04/01/2019   08:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hornet785 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Stamps4Life,

If you can show me all your KREUZER stamps, may be I can find something interesting.

Hornet
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
1303 Posts
Posted 04/01/2019   1:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stamps4Life to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
so I broke my sd card when I was trying to get a better shot of the above. will do once I get a replacement. tks!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 1,758Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05