| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,758 |
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
France
2926 Posts |
|
|
Your stamp in Michel catalog : #56 Year : 1888 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 4 (narrow horizontal wavy lines) |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by vayolene - 03/31/2019 12:43 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
Realize the numbers in catalogs are often rounded to the nearest half. Measuring a few used that I have, the top perfs and bottoms measure 14.25, the sides measure 14.5. So there's the difference. Some of the top perf holes on this one look deepened to obscure short perfs; that could throw off perf gauge measurement. It's not an expensive stamp, I know, but it still appears to be "improved". |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
432 Posts |
|
|
Hi, Under Michel and more under Peter Sem, These were issued in 1888, 1900 and 1920. Two type of papers and two type of perforations and for the extremist, two colors on the Bx. Comb perfs 14 Perf A and B, A: small holes, B: normal like this one Paper x, 1888, y, 1900 and y, 1920. In this case it is a Mi.Nr.56Bx Here one of my cover having two Nr.56By Best regards Hornet  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by hornet785 - 03/31/2019 08:28 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Hi,
Under Michel and more under Peter Sem,
These were issued in 1888, 1900 and 1920. Two type of papers and two type of perforations and for the extremist, two colors on the Bx.
Comb perfs 14
Perf A and B, A: small holes, B: normal like this one
Paper x, 1888, y, 1900 and y, 1920.
In this case it is a Mi.Nr.56Bx
Here one of my cover having two Nr.56By
Best regards
Hornet Tks. Im using a Scott catalogue, 2019. I dont see this stamp under or after 1920, regular postage???? I still think its a Scott 63 with the perf's being a little off. I didnt realize the perf. no.'s were rounded in the catalogue's. I dont have a Mitchell catalogue or conversion to Mitchell. Is 56 Mitchell the same as Scott 63? What do you mean by Bx ? Tks again |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Realize the numbers in catalogs are often rounded to the nearest half. Measuring a few used that I have, the top perfs and bottoms measure 14.25, the sides measure 14.5. So there's the difference. Some of the top perf holes on this one look deepened to obscure short perfs; that could throw off perf gauge measurement. It's not an expensive stamp, I know, but it still appears to be "improved". Tks much. Interesting on the rounding. I never knew that. Another variable to consider now. What do you mean by "improved" ? Faked / forged? Or better than ordinary condition? tks again. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
thanks vayolene - guessing that converts to Scott 63? Sorry, I had the wrong no. in the title(65)..... |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Stamps4Life - 03/31/2019 12:53 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
432 Posts |
|
|
Hi,
Yes, Nr.63 under Scott.
Yours is on tone paper (Which you don't see under Scott)
So under Michel and Peter Sem Cat, yours is a Nr.56Bx
B = Normal holes
x = Tone paper before 1900. y = White paper, issued 1900 to 1911.
The Scott 62, 63, 72 have been re-used in 1920.
Salutation
Hornet
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
432 Posts |
|
|
Hi, Ok, first, the design was used from 1876 to 1911 (Forget the old currency KREUZER from 1867-1875) So without Cat number and using Scott Watermark number: 1876-1881 1876 Perf 11 1/2 Watermark 95 (3 Pf, 5 green, 10, 20, 25, 50) 1878 Perf 11 1/2 Watermark 95 (5 Pf violet, 50) 1881 Perf 11 1/2 Watermark 95v (3 Pf, 5 violet, 10, 20, 25, 50) 1888-1900 1888 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95h (3 Pf, 5 violet, 10, 20, 25, 50) 1890 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95h (3 Pf brown, 5 green, 25, 50) 1900 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95h (2 Pf grey, 30, 40, 80) 1911 Perf 14 1/2 Watermark 95v (5 Pf green) Mark value stamps it is another story. So with that you can have fun sorting your stamps. They can not be mixed once you know Perf and Watermark. Here a link in german more specialized https://pfgzeit.hpage.de/wappen-37-75.htmlNice stamps there! Best regards Hornet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
432 Posts |
|
|
Hi Stamps4Life, Your 6 KREUZER Brown with the two circle postmark is a very good keeper!!! I think I see NÜRNBERG in 1856? It's not the town but the type of postmark. A good 50.00$ +++ Here one of mine Hornet  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by hornet785 - 03/31/2019 5:37 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
Hi Hornet - tks for all the info AND the link. A lot there. Here is another pic I took. Doesnt look quite as good as in real life but im sure theres a natural order in either taking the pic then cropping or vice versa then enlarging, etc... Sometimes I get better ones than other times.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
432 Posts |
|
|
Hi,
Nice, looks like a plate 3, 4 corners sharp. Beside the ink smear from cancellation, it's a good one.
The 3 KREUZER blue is another sport.
Hornet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
432 Posts |
|
|
Hi Stamps4Life,
If you can show me all your KREUZER stamps, may be I can find something interesting.
Hornet |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

1303 Posts |
|
|
so I broke my sd card when I was trying to get a better shot of the above. will do once I get a replacement. tks! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,758 |
|