Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Unfamiliar Mark On The Back Of Berlin Overprint Stamps

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,077Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1106 Posts
Posted 04/12/2020   1:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add danstamps54 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I've been deconstructing an old collection of Berlin stamps. I came across a marking on the back of the Berlin overprints (SC 9N1 – 9N34) that I've never encountered before. They are all stamped "Alfred Lippschütz" with GPSY in red underneath:




Generally a Lippschütz marking is considered a forgery although he apparently did some independent expertizing of Berlin issues.

https://briefmarken-pruefer.de/de/1...schuetz.html

I'm curious about the "GPSY" marking in red underneath. Is this another independent expertizing mark that I'm unfamiliar with or a collector's mark?

Unless I have a photo cert from BPP, I consider them highly suspect. There are many different forgeries of these issues. I'm just curious about the GPSY marking.

Any information would be appreciated!
Thanks!

Dan
Send note to Staff
Experienced stamps need a home too. I'd rather have an example that is imperfect than no example.
I collect for enjoyment, not investment.
APS Member #223433
Postmark Collectors Club Member #6333
Meter Stamp Society Member #1409

Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts
Posted 04/12/2020   1:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Lippschuetz was an expertizer for Berlin stamps.

The GPSY stamp is an additional expertizing mark of Dr. Werner Bohne of the Germany Philatelic Society (USA).

My internet search shows that there are forgeries of the Lippschuetz marking. So, Dr. Bohne gave his opinion that the stamp and marking are genuine.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
762 Posts
Posted 04/12/2020   1:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Germania to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The GPSY signature may be a forgery. It does not look like the genuine signature, especially the "S". The following is from this website: https://www.filatelia.fi/experts/index.html


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1106 Posts
Posted 04/12/2020   2:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add danstamps54 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Germania,

You are about in the same place I was before I posted. The website you referenced is my source of information too.

That site seems to indicate that all Lippschütz marks are forgeries. The digging I did seems to indicate that isn't the case. (see my link in the previous post). That made me wonder if that site isn't as comprehensive as I thought.

That's why I threw it out for discussion.

Dan
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Experienced stamps need a home too. I'd rather have an example that is imperfect than no example.
I collect for enjoyment, not investment.
APS Member #223433
Postmark Collectors Club Member #6333
Meter Stamp Society Member #1409
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts
Posted 04/12/2020   3:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here are two (ostensibly) Dr. Bohne markings from my "BERLIN" overprints collection.

Since I did not submit these stamps to Dr. Bohne for expertization, I don't take them seriously. Stamps were purchased from APS circuit books.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1106 Posts
Posted 04/12/2020   4:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add danstamps54 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Bookbndrbob,

You are providing evidence that the website I relied on for forged markings is, at best, incomplete.

Experts do change their marks occasionally. Of course they can also be easily forged. That is why I generally don't rely on them for accuracy. I would think that a potential forger would try to copy an original as closely as possible.

What made me curious about these stamps is that the GPSY marking is in red, something I've not seen before. What forger would advertise like that?

They may all be forged.... the quest continues!

Dan
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Experienced stamps need a home too. I'd rather have an example that is imperfect than no example.
I collect for enjoyment, not investment.
APS Member #223433
Postmark Collectors Club Member #6333
Meter Stamp Society Member #1409
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1106 Posts
Posted 05/09/2020   12:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add danstamps54 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I posed the same question to the Germany Philatelic Society that I posted here.

There appeared to be some discussion but the following seems to be the consensus opinion: (Names are omitted)

"I'd give the genuineness of the item (s) a very high rating. Although the overprints have been extensively forged, Dr. Bohne always sent anything submitted to the proper Bund expert. Hence that gpsy signum indicated that the material had been through that submission. btw, I'll disagree with ***'s comments about the gpsy signum, in the early days (pre about 1970 or so) before the Bund pruffer organization had been established, the gpsy did, indeed, indicate Expertization."

Obviously, the only way the question can be resolved is a BPP certification; the GPSY could be forged as well but I thought this information may be of interest to the group.

Dan
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Experienced stamps need a home too. I'd rather have an example that is imperfect than no example.
I collect for enjoyment, not investment.
APS Member #223433
Postmark Collectors Club Member #6333
Meter Stamp Society Member #1409
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,077Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.5 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05